APHC010475962025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3505] FRIDAY,THE SECOND DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.C.D.SEKHAR CONTEMPT CASE NO: 2804/2025 Between: 1. M/S MANASA CONSTRUCTIONS, REP. BY ITS MANAGING PARTNER K. KRISHNA PRASAD S/O. K. VENKATESWARA RAO, AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS R/O. D.NO. 15/207-19, ANANADAPETA, MACHILIPATNAM, KRISHNA DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. G SAI PRASAD IAS, PRINCIPLE SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT IRRIGATION AND CAD WATER RESOURCES RESOURCES DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, A.P. SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. SRI PEEYUSH KUMAR, PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, FINANCE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 3. SRI D K BABLAJI IAS, THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, (IRRIGATION WING) MACHILIPATNAM, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 4. SRI K NARSIMHA MURTHY, THE ENGINEER IN CHIEF MINOR AND MAJOR IRRIGATION DEPARTMENT GOVERNMENT OF ANDHRA PRADESH IRRIGATION BHAVAN VIJAYAWADA KRISHNA DISTRICT. 5. SRI R MOHAN RAO, THE SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER, IRRIGATION AND WATER RESOURCES DEPARTMENT, IRRIGATION CIRCLE, VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT 6. SRI B KIRAN BABU, THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, DRAINAGE DIVISION, GUDIVADA , KRISHNA DISTRICT. 7. K SOMAIAH, THE ASSISTANT PAY AND ACCOUNT OFFICER VIJAYAWADA KRISHNA DISTRICT ...CONTEMNOR(S): Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to may be pleased to punish the respondents U/s. 10 to 12 of contempts of Court Acts for willful and deliberate violation of Final order passed in WP No 17998/2024 dated 31.07.2025 by Learned Single Judge and to pass such Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. ANNAMNEEDI BALAKRISHNA Counsel for the Contemnor(S): 1. 2. T LAKSHMI PADMAJA The Court made the following order: Pursuant to the order dated 05.12.2025, the 6th respondent appeared before this Court. 2. When the matter is taken up for hearing, it is represented by the counsel for the respondents that, the order under contempt is complied with. 3. The counsel appearing for the petitioner also confirms same. 4. As the respondents have complied with the order, the present contempt case is closed. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, pending applications, if any, shall stand closed. _____________________ JUSTICE T.C.D.SEKHAR Dt.02.01.2026 DSB 16 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE T.C.D.SEKHAR CC.No.2804 OF 2025 Date: 02.01.2026 U DSB