Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 24201 (KAR)

SRI NARAYANASWAMY v. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

WP/36004/2019 · 2026-06-22

E S Indiresh

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:30599 WP No. 36004 of 2019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 22ND DAY OF JUNE, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH WRIT PETITION NO. 36004 OF 2019 (KLR-RR/SUR) BETWEEN: SRI. NARAYANASWAMY, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, S/O DODDANARAYANAPPA @ NARAYANAPPA, R/O KANAGAMAKALA VILLAGE, RONUR HOBLI, SRINIVASAPUR TALUK, KOLAR DISTRICT - 563 135. …PETITIONER (BY SRI.V.VINOD REDDY, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, VIKASA SOUDHA, DR. AMBEDKAR VEEDHI, BENGALURU - 01. REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY. 2. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, KOLAR DISTRICT, KOLAR - 563 101. 3. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER, KOLAR TALUK, KOLAR DISTRICT - 563 101. Digitally signed by CHAYA S A Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:30599 WP No. 36004 of 2019 4. THE THASILDAR , KOLAR TALUK, KOLAR DISTRICT - 563 101. 5. SRI. SHANKARAPPA, AGED ABOUT 28 YEARS, S/O LATE MUNEPPA @ DODDA MUNIYAPPA, R/O KANAGAMAKALA VILLAGE, RONUR HOBLI, SRINIVASAPUR TALUK, KOLAR DISTRICT - 563 135. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI.SPOORTHY HEGDE N., HCGP FOR R1 - R4; SRI.B.S.NATARAJA, ADVOCATE FOR R5) THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO CALL FOR CONCERNED RECORDS; QUASH THE ORDER DATED 24.04.2019 PASSED BY THE R-2 IN RA.127/2016-17 VIDE ANNEXURE - G AND CONSEQUENTLY QUASH THE ORDER DATED 21.10.2016 PASSED BY THE R-3 IN R.A.650/2013-14 VIDE ANNEXURE - D AND ETC., THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN 'B' GROUP, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:30599 WP No. 36004 of 2019 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH ORAL ORDER The learned HCGP accepts notice for Respondent Nos.1 to 4. 2. In this writ petition, petitioner is assailing the order dated 24.04.2019 in R.A.No.127 of 2016-17 on the file of Respondent No.2 (Annexure-G) and order dated 21.10.2016 in R.A.No.650 of 2013-14 on the file of Respondent No.3 (Annexure-D). 3. Having heard the learned counsel appearing for the parties and on careful consideration of the impugned orders, would indicate that the suit in O.S.No.134 of 2016 filed by Respondent No.5 herein (Plaintiff No.6 in the suit) on the file of the Additional Civil Judge and J.M.F.C., Srinivasapura, seeking declaration, with consequential relief of permanent injunction came to be decreed on 19.02.2024. - 4 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:30599 WP No. 36004 of 2019 4. In that view of the matter, as the rights of the parties has been crystallized by the competent Civil Court, I am of the view that no interference is called for, in this writ petition. Accordingly, Writ Petition stands dismissed. SD/- (E.S.INDIRESH) JUDGE DH List No.: 1 Sl No.: 53