UNION BANK OF INDIA, REP BY GEN MANAGER, MUMBAI AND ANOTHER v. DIST COOPERATIVE CENTRAL BANK LTD.,VISAKHAPATNAM & 7 OTHERS
AS/66/2009 · 2026-03-01
Balaji Medamalli, Ravi Nath Tilhari
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 24195 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 24195 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1 (RNT,J & BM,J A.S.NO.66 OF 2009)
APHC010471202009
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3572] MONDAY,THE SECOND DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI NATH TILHARI THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE BALAJI MEDAMALLI APPEAL SUIT NO: 66/2009 Between:
1. UNION BANK OF INDIA, REP BY GEN MANAGER, MUMBAI AND ANOTHER, REP BY ITS GENERAL MANAGER, HEAD OFFICE, UNION BANK BHAVAN, 239, VIDHAN BHAVAN MARG, NARIMAN POINT, MUMBAI - 400 021.
2. UNION BANK OF INDIA, KHAIRTABAD BRANCH OFFICE, REP BY ITS BRANCH MANAGER, KHAIRTABAD BRANCH, PAVANI PLAZA, COMMERCIAL COMPLEX, D.NO. 8-2-984, KHAIRATABAD, HYDERABAD.
...APPELLANT(S) AND
1. DIST COOPERATIVE CENTRAL BANK LTD VISAKHAPATNAM 7 OTHERS, REGISTERED NO. B1818, D.NO. 58-14-57/1, MARRIPALEM, VUDA LAYOUT, N.H.-5 ROAD, VISAKHAPATNAM.
REP BY ITS GEN MANAGER, SRI C.SREERAMACHANDRA MURTHY,
2. SRI C BHASKAR REDDY, S/O. MUNI RATNAM REDDY EX.GEN.MANAGER OF PLAINTIFFS BANK PRESENTED UNDER SUSPENSION C/O. P.GOVARDHAN, H.NO. 1-6-140/A, BEHIND DISTRICT CLUB, MAHABOOBNAGAR - 509 001.
3. SRI JAI BRATH SINHA, EX.OFFICER OF SIKKIM BANK LTD.
2 (RNT,J & BM,J A.S.NO.66 OF 2009)
PRESENTLY WORKING AS AN OFFICER IN UNION BANK OF INDIA, KHAIRTABAD BRANCH, D.NO. 6-2-984, PAVANI PLAZA COMMERCIAL COMPLEX,
4. SRI AJAY KUMAR, S/O. VENKATA NARASAYYA C/O. T.MOHAN RAO RESIDING AT D.NO. 50-2-84/5, GANDHINAGAR, SEETHAMMADHARA,
5. SRI VADLAMANI SUBBARAO, S/O. SOMANADHA SASTRY RETIRED MANAGER RESIDING AT D.NO. 43-16-23/2, SUBALAKSHMINAGAR, NEAR DONDAPARTHI, VISAKHAPATNAM - 530 016.
6. SRI PASUPATI SURYANARAYANA RAJU, S/O. RAMABHADRA RAJU ASST. MANAGER RESIDING AT FLAT NO. 403, GREENS ENCLAVE APARTMENTS, BHANUNAGAR, NEAR H.B. COLONY,
7. SRI SAGI APPALA VENKATA VARMA, S/O. SATYANARAYANA RAJU STAFF ASISTANT RESIDING AT D.NO. 39-9-103, MURALINAGAR, VISAKHAPATNAM - 530 007.
8. SRI RAMABHADRA RAJU, S/O. SRI APPALA RAJU MESSENGER R/O.D.NO. 91, KATURINAGAR, KAILASAPURAM POST, VISAKHAPATNAM - 530 007.
...RESPONDENT(S):
IA NO: 1 OF 2009(ASMP 204 OF 2009 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to grant stay of all further proceedings pursuant to the judgment and decree dated 15-9-2008 passed by the VI Additional District Judge, Visakhapatnam, in O.S.No. 18/2002 pending disposal of the above appeal and pass such other
order or orders in the interest of justice.
IA NO: 1 OF 2015(ASMP 6421 OF 2015 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased IA NO: 1 OF 2017(ASMP 2388 OF 2017
3 (RNT,J & BM,J A.S.NO.66 OF 2009)
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased direct the registry to post the matter as early as possible in view of the above circumstances of the case and to expedite the hearing of the above appeal IA NO: 1 OF 2023 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to permit the petitioner herein to file set of papers in AS.No. 66 of 2009 for the purpose of re-constructing the Honurable Court file case for adjudication in the interest of justice Counsel for the Appellant(S):
1. V DYUMANI Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. V UMA DEVI
2. ELEVATED AS JUDGE The Court made the following:
4 (RNT,J & BM,J A.S.NO.66 OF 2009)
JUDGMENT:-(per Hon’ble Sri Justice Ravi Nath Tilhari)
This appeal has been filed by the appellants/defendants 1 and 2, challenging the decretal order dated 15.09.2008 passed in O.S.No.18 of 2002 on the file of VI Additional District Judge at Visakhapatnam, in a suit filed by the respondent/plaintiff seeking recovery of money.
2. There is no representation for the appellants.
3. The Appeal Suit is dismissed “for want of prosecution”.
No order as to costs.
As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any pending, shall also stand closed.
____________________ RAVI NATH TILHARI, J
____________________ BALAJI MEDAMALLI,J Date : 02.03.2026. RPD.
5 (RNT,J & BM,J A.S.NO.66 OF 2009)
212 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI NATH TILHARI AND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE BALAJI MEDAMALLI
(DISMISSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION)
APPEAL SUIT NO: 66 OF 2009 Date: 02.03.2026
RPD.