APHC010478112023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3208] MONDAY, THE SECOND DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D RAMESH WRIT PETITION NO: 24675/2023 Between: 1. YENUGU NAGESWARA RAO, S/O. NUKARAJU, AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, OCC . ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE IN THE ELESWARAM P.A.C.S., ELESWARAM, EAST GODAVARI / KAKINADA DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, AGRICULTURE AND CO-OPERATION DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. 2. THE DISTRICT COOPERATIVE OFFICER, , EAST GODAVARI / KAKINADA DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. 3. DISTRICT COOPERATIVE CENTRAL BANK, EAST GODAVARI / KAKINADA DISTRICT. REP. BY ITS CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER 4. THE ELESWARAM P A C S, REP. BY ITS CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate Writ, Order, or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the Respondent No's.1 to 3 in proposing/threatening to retire 2 the petitioner from services at the age of 60 years even after resolution is passed by the 4th respondent on 31.03.2023, enhancing the petitioner's retirement age up to 62 years as per G.O.Ms.No.15 dated 31.01.2022 and continuing in service as bad, illegal, arbitrary and contrary to the principles of natural justice, without any jurisdiction, violative of Fundamental Rights guaranteed under Article 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India and contrary to the provisions of the Andhra Pradesh Cooperative Societies Act, 1964 and Rules made therein and consequently direct the respondents to continue the petitioner in service till the age of 62 years and pass such IA NO: 1 OF 2023 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased may be pleased to direct the respondents to continue the petitioner services till he attains the age of 62 years in 4th Respondent, and pass such Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. D V SASIDHAR Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR SERVICES II 2. SRINIVAS BASAVA The Court made the following: 3 ORDER: During the course of hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the cause does not survive in the Writ Petition and no further orders are required and prays to dismiss the Writ Petition as infructuous. By recording the said submission, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs. As a sequel thereto, interlocutory applications pending, if any, in the writ petition, shall also stand closed. __________________ JUSTICE D.RAMESH 02.3.2026 RD 4 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D.RAMESH WRIT PETITION NO.24675 OF 2023 02.3.2026 RD