Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2026 DAILYLAW 24190 (PNJ)

MAHEK AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF UT CHANDIGARH AND OTHERS

CRWP/7012/2026 · 2026-06-12

Sandeep Moudgil

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 143 CRWP-7012-2026 Date of Decision: 12.06.2026 MAHEK AND ANOTHER ....PETITIONERS VS STATE OF UT CHANDIGARH AND OTHERS .....RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP MOUDGIL Present:- Mr. Abhishek Lubana, Advocate, for the petitioners. Mr. Alankrit Bhardwaj, Additional P.P. U.T. for respondent No.1 to 3. **** SANDEEP MOUDGIL, J.(ORAL) The present petition under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India seeks directions restraining respondents No. 4 to 6 from harassing or interfering with the petitioners and further directing respondents No. 2 and 3 to ensure protection of the petitioners' life and liberty, along with any other appropriate relief deemed fit in the facts and circumstances of the case. After arguing for some time learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission for withdrawal of the instant petition. Prayer is accepted. Dismissed as withdrawn. (SANDEEP MOUDGIL) JUDGE 12.06.2026 Jyoti-V Whether her Speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No JYOTI 2026.06.13 17:04 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document