Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 24184 (AP)

M/S SRINIVASA EDIFICE PRIVATE LIMITED v. SRI KANTILALA DANDE IAS

CC/2530/2025 · 2026-01-28

Subba Reddy Satti

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010480932025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3331] THURSDAY, THE TWENTY NINETH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI CONTEMPT CASE NO: 2530/2025 Between: 1. M/S SRINIVASA EDIFICE PRIVATE LIMITED, MANAGING DIRECTOR, Y.V.KRISHNA MOHAN, S/O.LATE Y.J.M.PRASAD, AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS, R/O.D.NO.506, PRATHIBHA APARTMENTS, SEBASTIAN ROAD, SECUNDERABAD, TELANGANA . ...PETITIONER AND 1. SRI KANTILALA DANDE IAS, PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, ROADS AND BUILDINGS DEPARTMENT, A.P. SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. (R1) 2. V RAMACHANDRA, THE CHIEF ENGINEER (R AND B), N.H.AND C.R.F., VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT. (R2) 3. D SHANKAR REDDY, THE SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER, R AND B CIRCLE, VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT. (R3) 4. G SANJEEVA RAYUDU, THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, (R AND B), N.H.DIVISION, VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT. (R4) 5. PEEYUSH KUMAR IAS, PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE AND PLANNING, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. (R5) ...CONTEMNOR(S): 2 Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to direct the notices to the respondents herein and punish the Respondents under Sec. 10 to 12 of Contempt of Court Act, 1971 for deliberate, intentional and willful violation of the orders of this Hon'ble High Court dated 29.04.2025 passed in W.P. No. 1616 of 2024 and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. SURESH KUMAR REDDY KALAVA Counsel for the Contemnor(S): 1. Y BALAJI The Court made the following: :: ORDER :: Heard Sri Suresh Reddu Kalava, learned counsel for the petitioner. 2. The above contempt case is filed complaining about the violation of the order dated 29.04.2025 in W.P.No.1616 of 2024. 3. At the hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner, would submit that order dated 29.04.2025 in W.P.No.1616 of 2024, has been complied with. 4. Recording the same, the contempt case is dismissed. No costs. As a sequel, pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. ____________________________ JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI Date: 29.01.2026 SNI 3 213 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI CONTEMPT CASE NO: 2530/2025 Date: 29.01.2026 SNI