Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 24181 (AP)

A. Venkateswarao v. Andhra Pradesh Power Generation Corporation Limited

WP/11656/2013 · 2026-01-20

Harinath N

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010480702013 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] WEDNESDAY,THE TWENTY FIRST DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 11656/2013 Between: 1. A. VENKATESWARAO, S/O LATE KAMESWARARAO, AGE 59 YEARS, AP GENCO, (RETIRED EMPLOYEE) R/O DOOR NO. 45-47- 26, RAJAGIRI LAYOUT, AKKAYYAPALEM, VISAKHAPATNAM-16. ...PETITIONER AND 1. ANDHRA PRADESH POWER GENERATION CORPORATION LIMITED, VIDYUT SOUDHA, KHAIRATABAD, HYDERABAD, REP. BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR. 2. GENERAL MANAGER ADMINISTRATION, ANDHRA PRADESH POWER GENERATION CORPORATION LIMITED, VIDYUT SOUDHA, KHAIRATABAD, HYDERABAD 3. CHIEF ENGINEER OPERATIONS M ANDHRA PRADESH POWER, GENERATION CORPORATION LIMITED, KOTHAGUDEM THERMAL POWER STATION, V& VI STAGE PALVANCHA KHAMMAM DISTRICT. 4. SECURITY OFFICER ANDHRA PRADESH POWER GENERATION, CORPORATION LIMITED, DR. NARLA TATARAO THERMAL POWER STATION IBRAHIMPATNAM, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 5. ACCOUNTS OFFICER/OMI, ANDHRA PRADESH POWER GENERATION CORPORATION LIMITED, DR. NARIATATARAOTHERMAL POWER STATION IBRAHIMPATNAM, KRISHNA DISTRICT 2 6. SENIOR ACCOUNTS OFFICER OM KTPP, ANDHRA PRADESH POWER GENERATION CORPORATION LIMITED, CHELPUR PO, GHANPUR MANDAL, WARANGAL DISTRICT. 7. ACCOUNTS OFFICER NAGARJUNA SAGAR TAIL POND DAM CIRCLE, PYLON COLONY, AP GENCLO, NAGARJUNA SAGAR, NALGONDA DISTRICT. 8. PAY OFFICER ANDHRA PRADESH POWER GENERATION, CORPORATION LIMITED, VIDYUT SOUDHA, KHAIRATABAD, HYDERABAD, ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toIssue any appropriate Writ, Order or direction preferably a Writ in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the Memo No. SO/Dr. NTTPS/PRS/Security/D. No. 16/2013 dt. 3.2.2013 issued by 4th respondent as well as consequential Letter No.AO/O&MI/Dr.NTTPS/Security/PRSTD. No. 411/13 dated 4.2.2013 addressed by the 5th respondent to the 6th respondent as being illegal, arbitrary, contrary to the principles of natural justice, contrary to clause 3 of Annexure-l of BP Ms No. 501 dt. 19.5.1989 (Brochure on simplified procedures for terminal benefits) and also violative of Art. 14 of the Constitution of India and consequently set aside the same and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2013(WPMP 14432 OF 2013 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased stay all further proceedings pursuant to the Memo No. SO/Dr. NTTPS/PRS/Security/D. No. 16/2013 dt. 3.2.2013 issued by 4th respondent as well as consequential Letter No.A0/08cM1/Dr.NTTPS/Security/PRS/D. No. 411/13 dated 4.2.2013 addressed by the 5th respondent to the 6th respondent, pending disposal of the above writ petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. M KARUNA SAGAR Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. K ARUNA 3 2. K UDAYA SRI 3. K.KRISHNABUSHAN CHOWDARY SC For APGENCO The Court made the following: 4 Order:- Despite the matter being listed under the caption for dismissal, today none represented for the petitioner. On earlier occasion also, there is no representation for the petitioner. Therefore, this Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. ____________________ JUSTICE HARINATH.N 21.01.2026 PNS