Mari Ramar v. The State Of Tamilnadu Rep By Inspector Of Police, Pudukottai
CRL OP(MD)/5951/2026 · 2026-03-26
P Dhanabal
Transfer Petitionbody2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 24179 (MAD) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 24179 (MAD) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
CRL OP(MD). No. 5951 of 2026 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Date : 26.03.2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P. DHANABAL CRL OP(MD). No. 5951 of 2026 Mari Ramar ...Petitioner/Accused
Vs State of Tamil Nadu rep. by The Inspector of Police, Pudukottai Police Station, Thoothukudi. (Crime No. 143 of 2026 )
...Respondent/Complainant
For Petitioner : Mr.S.Vishnuvardhan
Advocate.
For Respondent : Mr.B.Nambi Selvan Additional Public Prosecutor PETITION FOR BAIL Under Sec.483 of BNSS PRAYER :- For Bail in Cr.No. 143 of 2026 on the file of the respondent police. 1/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
CRL OP(MD). No. 5951 of 2026
ORDER : The Court made the following order :- The petitioner / Accused, who was arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 07.03.2026 for the offences punishable under Section 123 of BNS and Section 24(1) of COTPA Act in Crime No. 143 of 2026 on the file of the respondent police, seeks bail. 2. The case of the prosecution is that on 07.03.2026, based on the secret information, when the respondent police were conducting raid, they found that the petitioner was in illegal possession of 15 kg banned tobacco products. Hence the case. 3. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner is innocent and he was falsely implicated in this case and he has not committed any offence as alleged by the prosecution. He would further submit that he has been arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 07.03.2026. Therefore, prayed to grant bail for the petitioner. 4. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondent would submit that the petitioner is having five previous cases, 2/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
CRL OP(MD). No. 5951 of 2026 out of which four cases are similar in nature. He would further submit that the investigation is pending and hence, he strongly opposed to grant bail to the petitioner. 5. This Court heard both sides and perused the materials available on record. 6. Considering the rival submissions made by the learned counsel on either side, nature of offence and the quantity involved in this case and considering the fact that though the petitioner has five previous cases, in all cases the petitioner was granted bail and also considering the period of incarceration undergone by the petitioner, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner subject to the following conditions: [a] Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail on condition to execute a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate-III, Thoothukudi and on further conditions that: 3/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
CRL OP(MD).
No. 5951 of 2026 [b] the petitioner shall report before the Inspector of Police, Athur Police Station, Thoothukudi, daily at 10.30 a.m., until further orders; [c] the petitioner shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he/she is accused, or suspected, or of the commission of which he/she is suspected; [d] the petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation or trial; [e] the petitioner shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade her from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence; [f] On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Judicial Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioner released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. 4/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
CRL OP(MD). No. 5951 of 2026 State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560]. [g] If the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 269 BNS. (P D B J)
26.03.2026 apd
To 1.The Judicial Magistrate-III, Thoothukudi. 2.The Inspector of Police, Pudukottai Police Station, Thoothukudi. 3. The Inspector of Police, Athur Police Station, Thoothukudi. 4. The Superintendent, District Jail, Peraurani. 5.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. 5/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
CRL OP(MD). No. 5951 of 2026 P. DHANABAL, J apd
ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No. 5951 of 2026 Date : 26.03.2026 6/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis