APHC010475252022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] WEDNESDAY,THE SEVENTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 28897/2022 Between: 1. MYLAPALLI NARASIMHA MURTHY, S/O LATE LAKSHMAYYA, AGE 60 YEARS, R/O DNO 9-15-22, DAMMALA STREET, SRIKAKULAM TOWN AND DISTRICT ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPLE SECRETARY HOME DEPARTMENT, AP SECRETARIAT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS AT VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT, SRIKAKULAM 3. THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR CUM STATION HOUSE OFFICER, SRIKAKULAM RURAL POLICE STATION, SRIKAKULAM. 4. THE TAHSILDAR, SRIKAKULAM MANDAL, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT. 5. THE ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, SRIAKKAIULAM RURAL, ANDHRA PRADESH EASTERN POWER DISTRIBUTION COMPANY LIMITED, SRIKAKULAM. 6. DHARMANA RAMALINGAM NAIDU, S/O DHARMANA KRISHNADAS, AGE 36 YEARS, R/O DNO 5-26, DHARMANA STREET, MABAGAM VILLAGE, POLAKI MANDAL, SRIKAKULAM DISTICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS aggrivied by the action of Respondents in interfering with civil disputes which were pending before competent civil courts in 0.S No 2 of 2022 on the file fo the Principal District Judge, Srikakulam and 0.S No 2 of 2022 on the fle of the 2nd Additional Senior Civil Judge, Srikakulam which is sub judicie to pending civil disputes and the same is without any authority which is highly illegal, arbitrary, unjust, harsh, and contrary to law and violations of Principles of 2 Natural Justice and contrary Articles 300-A, 14, 8621 of Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents not to interfere with civil disputes pending between Petitioner and 6th Respondent and pass such other order or orders as this Hon'ble Court may deems just and proper in facts and circumstances of case to meet the ends of justice. Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. S SRINIVASA RAO Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME 2. GP FOR REVENUE 3. METTA CHENDRA SEKHAR RAO 4. V SUDHAKAR REDDY 3 The Court made the following: ORDER: This Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, has been filed, by the Petitioner for the following relief: < ... to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS aggrieved by the action of Respondents in interfering with civil disputes which were pending before competent civil courts in OS No.2 of 2022 on the file of the Principal District Judge, Srikakulam and OS No.2 of 2022 on the file of the II Additional Senior Civil Judge, Srikakulam which is sub judice to pending civil disputes and the same is without any authority which is highly illegal, arbitrary, unjust, harsh, and contrary to law and violations of Principles of Natural Justice and contrary Articles 300-A, 14, 21 of Constitution of India and consequently, direct the respondents not to interfere with civil disputes pending between Petitioner and 6th Respondent and pass such other order or orders as this Hon'ble Court may deems just and proper in facts and circumstances of case to meet the ends of justice. ...= Heard learned counsel for the Petitioner, learned counsel for unofficial respondents and Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home representing for respondent State. Perused the material on record. Learned Assistant Government Pleader on written instructions would submit that there are civil disputes pending between the Petitioner and unofficial respondents and civil suits are pending before the concerned Civil Courts. Further, respondent Police did not interfere in the civil disputes between the parties and requested to dispose of the Writ Petition by passing appropriate orders. Learned counsel for unofficial respondents would submit that civil suit which is filed for permanent injunction is decreed in favour of the unofficial respondents and would submit the Court may pass appropriate orders by disposing of this Writ Petition. 4 Learned counsel for the Petitioner would submit that recording the submissions, this Writ Petition may be disposed of by passing appropriate orders. Considering the submissions, this Writ Petition is disposed of. Respondent Police are directed to follow due process of law with regard to the subject matter. No order as to costs. Pending applications, if any, shall stand closed. DR.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Mjl/* 07.01.2026 5 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Writ Petition No. 28897 of 2022 07.01.2026 Mjl /*