Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Himachal Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 24177 (HP)

INDER LAL v. SHIV SHARMA

CR.R/432/2026 · 2026-09-23

Rakesh Kainthla

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Inder Lal vs. Shiv Sharma Cr. Revision No. 432 of 2026 Reserved on 14.09.2026 23.09.2026 Present: Mr Ram Krishan Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioner. CrMP No. 3852 of 2026 The applicant has filed the present application for placing documents on record. It has been asserted that the documents sought to be produced are the copies of the order sheets to demonstrate that no adequate opportunity was provided to the applicant to produce evidence. Hence, it has been prayed that the present application be allowed and the documents be taken on record. Heard. The documents sought to be produced on record are the certified copies of the order sheets. One of the pleas taken by the applicant in the revision is that no adequate opportunity for producing the evidence was provided to him, and the copies of the order sheets would help in determining whether the plea taken by the applicant is correct or not; therefore, the documents sought to be produced on record are relevant for adjudicating the revision. Hence, the present application is allowed, and the documents are ordered to be taken on record. 2 The application stands disposed of. Cr. Revision No. 432 of 2026 List the matter for consideration after one week. (Rakesh Kainthla) Judge 23rd September, 2026 (Nikita)