1 2026:CGHC:26934 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 4331 of 2022 1 - Dr. G.S Choudhary S/o Late Shri G.P. Choudhary Aged About 67 Years Through Manish Kumar Choudhary S/o Dr. G.S. Choudhary Aged 39 Years, R/o 87, Mahesh Nagar, Choudhary Pathology, Gurudwara Road, Near Old Hospital Rajnandgaon, District Rajnandgaon Chhattisgarh. ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - Naresh Kumar Parchani S/o Late Aasan Das Parchani Aged About 51 Years R/o Street No. 1, Anupam Nagar, District Rajnandgaon Chhattisgarh. 2 - Rent Control Authority, District Rajnandgaon Chhattisgarh. 3 - Rent Control Tribunal, District Raipur Chhattisgarh. ... Respondent(s) ( Cause title taken from CIS Periphery) 2 For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ankit Swarnkar on behalf of Mr. T.K. Tiwari, Advocate For Respondent No.1 : Mr. Nitesh Jain, Advocate SB: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad Order on Board 01/07/2026 1. Heard. 2. By way of this petition, the petitioner seeks the following reliefs : “10.1 That, the Hon'ble court may be pleased to issue a Writ of Mandamus as to set aside the impugned order as Annexure P-1 dated 30/09/2022 passed by the Respondent no.2 in the ends of justice. 10.2 Any other relief, which this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper looking to the facts and circumstances of the case, may also be awarded to the Petitioner including the cost and expenses of this petition.” 3. Learned counsel for respondent No. 1 submits that the Rent Control Authority passed an order in favour of respondent No. 1 on the basis of a compromise arrived at between the parties. 3 Aggrieved thereby, the petitioner preferred an appeal before the Rent Control Tribunal, which also came to be dismissed. Thereafter, respondent No. 1 obtained possession of the suit premises. It is further submitted that the petitioner also filed W.P. (C) No. 4459 of 2022 challenging the orders passed by the Rent Control Authority and the Rent Control Tribunal, which too came to be dismissed by a Division Bench of this Court vide order dated 05.09.2023. As such, the present petition has become infructuous. 4. At this stage, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has also expired. 5. In view of the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, no useful purpose would be served by adjudicating the present petition on merits. Accordingly, the present petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. Sd/- (Amitendra Kishore Prasad) Judge Ruchi RUCHI YADAV Digitally signed by RUCHI YADAV