Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 24176 (KAR)

MRS KAVITHA M v. M/S UNION BANK OF INDIA

WP/7987/2026 · 2026-06-29

Jyoti M

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:32094 WP No. 7987 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 29TH DAY OF JUNE, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI M WRIT PETITION NO. 7987 OF 2026 (GM-DRT) BETWEEN: 1. MRS. KAVITHA M., W/O. MR. MANJUNATH M., AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS, 2. MR. MANJUNATH M., S/O. MARIYAPPA, AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS, BOTH THE PETITIONERS ARE R/AT E-29, MILK DAIRY ROAD, G.S.PALYA, ELECTRONIC CITY POST, KONAPPANA AGRAHARA, BEGUR HOBLI, BENGALURU-560100. …PETITIONERS (BY SMT. KAVITHA D., ADVOCATE) AND: M/S. UNION BANK OF INDIA, (EARLIER ANDRA BANK AMALGAMATED INTO UNION BANK OF INDIA WITH EFFECT FROM 01-04-2020), (REGISTERED U/S 9 OF BANKING COMPANIES ACT 1970/80) ASSET RECOVERY BRANCH BENGALURU, NO.2/3, RAJA BUILDING, N.R.ROAD, BENGALURU-560 002. IFSC CODE: UBINO555991 Digitally signed by PREMCHANDRA M R Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:32094 WP No. 7987 of 2026 REPRESENTED BY ITS AUTHORIZED OFFICER. …RESPONDENT (BY SRI. KIRAN KUMAR A.S., ADVOCATE FOR SMT. DIVYA PURANDAR, ADVOCATE) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, SEEKING CERTAIN RELIEFS. THIS WRIT PETITION IS LISTED FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, AN ORDER IS MADE AS UNDER: ORAL ORDER Smt.Kavitha D, counsel for the petitioners and Sri.Kiran Kumar, counsel on behalf of Smt.Divya Purandar, for respondent appeared in person. Counsel for the petitioner submits that the petition may be dismissed as not pressed. When queried, counsel for the petitioner submits that a conscious decision is taken about non pressing of the petition and if an order is passed the petitioner shall not seek review of the order or modification of the order. The oral submission is placed on record. - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:32094 WP No. 7987 of 2026 As the counsel on record has taken a conscious decision about non pressing of the petition, the Writ Petition is dismissed as not pressed. Because of dismissal of the Writ Petition, all pending interlocutory applications if any are disposed of. SD/- (JYOTI M) JUDGE SS List No.: 1 Sl No.: 1