THE DIST. COOP. CENTRAL BANK LTD., W.G. DIST. v. THE AUTHORITY UNDER MINIMUM WAGES ACT & 38 ORS.
WP/9116/2011 · 2026-02-23
Harinath N
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 24166 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 24166 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010479922011
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] TUESDAY,THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 9116/2011 Between:
1. THE DIST. COOP. CENTRAL BANK LTD., W.G. DIST., W.G.
DISTRICT, AT ELURU, REP. BY ITS CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER G.
SIMHACHALAM. ...PETITIONER AND
1. THE AUTHORITY UNDER MINIMUM WAGES ACT 38 ORS, OF LABOUR, ZONE II, ELURU, W.G. DISTRICT. 2. AMBIKA DETECTIVE SECURITY SERVICES, NEAR AMBIKA THEATRE CENTRE, I TOWN ELURU, W.G.DISTRICT, REP. BY S.SIVA KUMAR. 3. NAKKA SURESH, S/O. TILAK
4. CH YESU, S/O. NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER
5. K GOPALA KRISHNA, S/O. NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER
6. B APPALA RAJU, S/O. NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER
7. P NAGA RAJU, S/O. NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER
8. CH VENKATESWARA RAO, S/O. NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER
9. J KESAVA RAO, S/O. NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER
10. A RAMA KRISHNA, S/O. NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER
2
11. D NAGESWARA RAO, S/O. NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER
12. U NAGUR, S/O. TILAK
13. CH CHINNA BABU, S/O. NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER
14. J RAMANJANEYULU, S/O. NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER
15. P RAVI SHANKAR PRASAD, S/O. NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER
16. K V V SATYANARAYANA, S/O. NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER
17. V CHANDRA SEKHAR BABU, S/O. NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER
18. J NARAYANA, S/O. NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER
19. K BHUSHANAM, S/O. NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER
20. M SRIRAMULU, S/O. NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER
21. M CHITTI RAJU, S/O. NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER
22. P TATA RAO, S/O. NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER
23. MD AJAM SHARIFF, S/O. NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER
24. K RAM BABU, S/O. NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER
25. N RAM BABU, S/O. NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER
26. T RAM BABU, S/O. NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER
27. P NOOKA RAJU, S/O. NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER
28. B MOHAN BABU, S/O. NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER
29. K SUDHAKAR, S/O. NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER
30. A NAGESWARA RAO, S/O. NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER
31. K PEDDABBULU, S/O. NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER
32. P SRIRAMA KRISHNA, S/O. NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER
33. B SAI BABU, S/O. NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER
34. B SRINIVAS, S/O. NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER
3
35.
G PANDU, S/O. NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER
36. D RAMESH BABU, S/O. NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER
37. V CHANDRA RAO, S/O. NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER
38. U VENKATA RAO, S/O. NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER
39. T SATYANARAYANA, S/O. NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER (RESPONDENTS NOS. 3 TO 39, ARE REP. BY SRI PAGADALA VENKATA RATNAM NAIDU, PRESIDENT INTUC, ELURU, WEST GODAVARI)
...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. SURAGANI VIJAYA KUMAR Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR LABOUR The Court made the following:
4
ORDER:-
There is no representation for the petitioner today. On 19.02.2026 also, as there was no representation for the petitioner, the matter was directed to be listed under the caption “For Dismissal”. It seems that the petitioner is not interested to prosecute the case. Hence, this Writ Petition is “dismissed for non-prosecution”. No order as to costs. ____________________ JUSTICE HARINATH.N
Date.24.02.2026 SR