Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 24165 (AP)

Smt.V.K.Sasikala v. Tirumala Tirupati Devasthanams (T.T.D), Rep.by its

WP/1394/2013 · 2026-03-31

Harinath N

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010470492013 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] WEDNESDAY,THE FIRST DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 1394/2013 Between: 1. SMT.V.K.SASIKALA, W/O U.V.SESHU KUMAR, AGED 43 YEARS, OCC: LECTURER, SRI VENKATESWARA COLLEGE OF MUSIC & DANCE, BALAJI COLONY, TIRUPATI, R/O D.NO.4-6-5A, RESERVOIR STREET, TIRUPATI, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. TIRUMALA TIRUPATI DEVASTHANAMS T T D REP BY ITS, EXECUTIVE OFFICER, TIRUPATI, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 2. SRI VENKATESWARA COLLEGE OF MUSIC DANCE, REP.BY ITS PRINCIPAL, BALAJI COLONY, TIRUPATI, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue writ or order or direction more particularly one in the nature of the Writ of Certiorari call for the records and quash the Memo issued by the 1st Respondent in proceedings Roc.No.DA1/482/2013, dated 06-01-2013 being illegal, arbitrary and violative of Article 16 of the Constitution of India apart from being violative of principles of natural justice IA NO: 1 OF 2013(WPMP 1682 OF 2013 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the Memo issued by the 1st Respondent in proceedings 2 Roc.No.DA1/482/2013, dated 06-01-2013, pending final disposal of the main writ petition IA NO: 1 OF 2014(WVMP 72244 OF 2014 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. SRICHARAN TELAPROLU Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. NVS PRASADA VARMA 2. A RADHA KRISHNA The Court made the following: 3 Order: The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner seeks the permission of this Court to withdraw the present Writ Petition. 2. Permission is accorded. 3. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. ___________________ JUSTICE HARINATH.N Date: 01.04.2026 SR