APHC010481522025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3331] THURSDAY,THE FIFTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI CONTEMPT CASE NO: 2524/2025 Between: 1. P.VENKATA RAMI REDDY, , AGED 68 YEARS, S/O. LATE CHINNA MALLA REDDY, D.N0.25/117-B, SANJEEVANAGAR, NANDYAL, NANDYAL DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. ...PETITIONER AND 1. SRI PEEYUSH KUMAR, PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, FOR THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE AND PLANNING SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT 2. M T KRISHNA BABU, PRINCIPAL SECRETARY FOR THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, TRANSPORT, ROADS AND BUILDINGS DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 3. M V R VIVEKANANDA REDDY, THE CHIEF ENGINEER, ROADS AND BUILDINGS DEPARTMENT, NH AND CRF, VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 4. P MAHESHWAR REDDY, THE SUPERINTENDENT ENGINEER, ROADS AND BUILDINGS DEPARTMENT, KUMOOL, KURNOOL DISTRICT 5. A V SREEDHAR REDDY, THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, ROADS AND BUILDINGS DEPARTMENT, NANDYAL, NANDYAL DISTRICT. p. 2 ...CONTEMNOR(S): Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to pleased to direct the notices to the respondents herein and punish the respondents under section 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 for deliberate, intentional and willful violation of the orders of this Honble Court dated 25-03-2025 in WP.No.25966 of2024 and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. THATHIREDDY ASHOK SRIVASTAVA Counsel for the Contemnor(S): 1. Y BALAJI The Court made the following: :: ORDER :: The above contempt case was filed complaining of the violation of the order dated 25.03.2025, passed in W.P.No.25966 of 2024. 2. Today, when the matter is taken up for consideration, learned counsel for the petitioner would submit, pending the contempt case, the amount has been paid to the petitioner and the order dated 25.03.2025, passed in W.P.No.25966 of 2024 has been complied with. Hence, no further adjudication is required in the contempt case. 3. Recording the submission made by learned counsel for the petitioner, the Contempt Case is dismissed. No order as to costs. As a sequel, pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. ___________________________ JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI Date: 05.02.2026 TVN p. 3 154 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI CONTEMPT CASE No.2524 OF 2025 Date: 05.02.2026 TVN