Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 24154 (AP)

SEEPANA JAYARAM v. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH

WP/24434/2025 · 2026-01-27

D Ramesh

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010480892025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3208] WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY EIGHTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D RAMESH WRIT PETITION NO: 24434/2025 Between: 1. SEEPANA JAYARAM, S/O VENKANNA, AGED 45 YEARS, OCC EX.MUNICIPAL COMMISSIONER, R/O D.NO.39-21-16/1, SF, FLAT NO.301, MOUNISHA GRAND, MADHAVADHARA, VISAKHAPATNAM, ANDHRA PRADESH. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP.BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT (VIG.I) DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE COMMISSIONER AND DIRECTOR, MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION, VADDESWARAM, GUNTUR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in not revoking the suspension Order dt.02.07.2025 vide G.O.RT.No.657 by considering the Representation dt.22.08.2025 of the petitioner as illegal arbitrary malafide against the principles of Natural 2 Justice besides violation of Constitutional Guarantees and to consequently to direct the respondents for revoking the suspension Order dt.02.07.2025 vide G.O.RT.No.657 by considering the Representation dt.22.08.2025 of the petitioner in the interest of justice and to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents to consider the Representation dt.22.08.2025 of the Petitioner, during the pendency of the Writ Petition in the interest of justice and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. DEVALARAJU ANIL KUMAR Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR SERVICES I The Court made the following: 3 ORDER: The present Writ Petition is filed, under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking the following relief: <to issue any writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus or an appropriate writ or order declaring the action of the respondents in not revoking the suspension Order dt.02.07.2025 vide G.O.RT.No.657 by considering the Representation dt.22.08.2025 of the petitioner as illegal arbitrary malafide against the principles of Natural Justice besides violation of Constitutional Guarantees and consequently to direct the respondents for revoking the suspension Order dt.02.07.2025 vide G.O.RT.No.657 by considering the Representation dt.22.08.2025 of the petitioner in the interest of justice and to pass….= 2. Heard M/s.Anilkumar Devalaraju, learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Assistant Government Pleader appearing for respondents. 3. As the Writ Petition was filed praying the Court to consider the representation of the petitioner dated 22.8.2025 for revoking the suspension order dated 02.7.2025 vide G.O.Rt.No.657, without going into the merits of the case and with the consent of both side counsel, the respondents are directed to consider the case of the petitioner as per G.O.Rt.No.657 dated 02.7.2025 by considering the representation dated 22.8.2025 and pass appropriate orders. 4. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is disposed of. No costs. As a sequel thereto, interlocutory applications pending, if any, in the writ petition, shall also stand closed. __________________ JUSTICE D.RAMESH 28.01.2026 RD 4 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D.RAMESH WRIT PETITION No.24434 OF 2025 28.01.2026 RD