Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2026 DAILYLAW 24151 (PNJ)

SURJEET SINGH v. STATE OF PUNJAB AND ORS

CRWP/6978/2026 · 2026-06-12

Sandeep Moudgil

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 141 CRWP-6978-2026 Date of Decision: 12.06.2026 SURJEET SINGH ....PETITIONER VS STATE OF PUNJAB AND ORS. .....RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP MOUDGIL Present:- Mr. Lajpat Rai Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner (Through hybrid mode). Mr. Satjot Singh Chahal, AAG, Punjab. **** SANDEEP MOUDGIL, J.(ORAL) This Criminal Writ Petition Under Article 226 of Constitution of India for issuance of a writ in the nature of mandamus directing the official respondent no 2 and 3 to ensure life and liberty of petitioners at the hands of private respondents no. 4 to 9. 2. At the outset, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he will be satisfied, in case a direction is issued to respondent No.2-the Senior Superintendent of Police Fazilka, District Fazilka to decide the representation dated 29.05.2026 (Annexure P-1) within a time bound manner. 3. Without adverting to the merits of the case, the respondent No.2-the Senior Superintendent of Police Fazilka, District Fazilka is directed to consider and decide the representation dated 29.05.2026 (Annexure P-1), after providing opportunity of hearing to the parties, by JYOTI 2026.06.13 17:03 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRWP-6978-2026 -2- passing a speaking order in accordance with law within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order. 4. A copy of order so passed be supplied to the petitioner within seven days thereafter. 5. Petition stands disposed of in the aforesaid terms. (SANDEEP MOUDGIL) JUDGE 12.06.2026 Jyoti-V Whether her Speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No JYOTI 2026.06.13 17:03 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document