Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 24151 (JHR)

SUCHITA JAISWAL v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

Cr.M.P./3563/2022 · 2026-08-27

Anil Kumar Choudhary

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:JHHC:25858] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr.M.P. No.3563 of 2022 ------ 1. Suchita Jaiswal, aged about 35 years, Wife of Jitendra Kumar Jaiswal, Resident of Village- Lodam, P.O. & P.S.- Jashpur, District- Jashpur, Chattisgarh (496338) 2. Ritu Jaiswal @ Rita Jaiswal, aged about 40 years, Wife of Ajay Kumar, Resident of Allahabad Road, Karwi Mafi, P.O. & P.S.- Gandhiganj, District- Chitrakoot, Uttar Pradesh (210205) 3. Ruby Kumari @ Ruby Jaiswal, aged about 31 years, Wife of Ravi Kumar Agarwal, Resident of Jhanda Chowk, Near Vaishno Devi Mandir, Ward No.08, P.O. & P.S.- Ramgarh, District- Ramgarh, Jharkhand (829122) … Petitioners Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand 2. Srishti Kumari, aged about 28 years, wife of Shantanu Jaiswal, D/o Brajesh Prasad, Resident of Mohalla near Bhawan, Barwatoli, Purana Shukar Bazaar, P.O. & P.S. & District Lohardaga, Jharkhand … Opposite Parties ------ CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioner : None For the State : Ms. Amrita Kumari, Addl.P.P. For the O.P. No. : Mr. Santosh Kr. Jha, Advocate ------ Order No:-07 Dated:-27-08-2026 Heard the learned counsel appearing for the State and the learned counsel for the opposite party No.2. No one turns up on behalf of the petitioners in spite of repeated calls. Learned counsel appearing for the State and the learned counsel for the opposite party No.2 submit that since there is no merit in this Cr.M.P., hence, the petitioners are not diligent in prosecuting this Cr.M.P. Accordingly, this Cr.M.P. is dismissed for non-prosecution. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Dated-27.08.2026-Animesh/