Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 24146 (CHH)

MAZDOOR KALYAN SANGH KUDUMKELA v. MR. MAYANK CHATURVEDI, IAS

CONT/1316/2025 · 2026-07-01

Shri Bibhu Datta Guru

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2026:CGHC:27182 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CONT No. 1316 of 2025 Mazdoor Kalyan Sangh Kudumkela Village And Post- Kudumkela (Laxmi Chowk), Tahsil- Gharghoda Distt. Raigarh (C.G.) Through Its Secretary, Vikas Das, Aged About 34 Years, S/o Shri Manik Das, Occupation- Labour, Residence- Kudumkela, Tah. Gharghoda Distt. Raigarh (C.G.) Vide Registration No. 27105, Dated 28-05-2015 Petitioner(s) versus 1 - Mr. Mayank Chaturvedi, IAS Collector, District Raigarh (C.G.) 2 - Mr. Kartikey Goel, IAS The Then Collector, District Raigarh (C.G.) (Presently Working As Director, Chhattisgarh Civil Supply Corporation And Consumer Protection With Additional Charge As Managing Director, Chhattisgarh State Warehouse Corporation, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Nawa Raipur, Chhattisgarh) Respondent(s) (Cause-title taken from Case Information System) For Petitioner(s) : Mr. A.N. Bhakta and Mr. Vivek Bhakta, Advocates For Respondent(s) : Mr. Suyashdhar Bhadgaiya, Advocate (HON’BLE SHRI JUSTICE BIBHU DATTA GURU) Order on Board 02/07/2026 1. At the outset, learned counsel for respondent No. 1, by referring to Annexure R/1, would submit that pursuant to the directions issued by RAHUL JHA Digitally signed by RAHUL JHA Date: 2026.07.02 17:37:55 +0530 2 this Court in WPC No. 2322/2024, the Collector directed the Assistant Labour Commissioner to decide the application/representation of the petitioner in accordance with the order dated 12/08/2024 passed in the aforesaid writ petition. It is further submitted that the Assistant Labour Commissioner, after due consideration of the petitioner’s case and upon calling the petitioner as well as the concerned association, was informed that the association was not in a position to enhance the wages. It is, therefore, submitted that there has been substantial compliance of the order passed by this Court through the action taken by the Collector and the Assistant Labour Commissioner, and the claim of the petitioner has been rejected. 2. Having considered the submissions made and on perusal of the record, this Court is satisfied that the directions issued earlier have been complied with. 3. Accordingly, the petition stands disposed of as having been rendered infructuous in view of compliance. Rule stands discharged. Sd/- (BIBHU DATTA GURU) JUDGE Rahul