APHC010473732025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3327] FRIDAY, THE SIXTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K SREENIVASA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO: 24060/2025 Between: 1. NAKKA ANAND KUMAR, S/O LATE VENKANNA, AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS OCC JOINT SUB-REGISTRAR (RETD.), R/O D.NO.4-62-15, LAWSONS BAY COLONY, VISAKHAPATNAM CITY, A.P. 2. P. SUNDARA NALINI, , W/O NAKKA ANAND KUMAR, AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS, OCC HGA, LIC, VISAKHAPATNAM, R/O. D.NO.4-62-15, LAWSONS BAY COLONY, VISAKHAPATNAM CITY, A.P. 3. NAKKA MADHU KUMAR,, S/O VENKANNA, AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS, OCC GOVT. TEACHER, R/O 1-46/6/1,PLOT NO. 22, MUSALAYYAPALEM-YENDADA, SAGARNAGAR, VISAKHAPATNAM (RURAL), AP, 530045. 4. NAKKA VIVEK KUMAR,, S/O NAVARATNA KUMAR, AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS, OCC BUSINESS, H NO. 6-20, PEDAPETA, LANKALA KODERU, PALKOL MANDAL, W G DISTRICT- 534 250. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. UNION OF INDIA, REP.BY ITS SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF FINANCE DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, NORTH BLOCK, NEW DELHI-110001. 2. THE DIRECTORATE OF ENFORCEMENT, REP. BY THE ASSISTANT DIRECTOR, ZONAL OFFICE, VISAKHAPATNAM, 530017, A.P. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. MAHADEVA KANTHRIGALA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. JOSYULA BHASKARA RAO ( SC FOR E D ) 2. 2 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE K. SREENIVASA REDDY Writ Petition No.24060 of 2025 Order: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking the following prayer; “….to issue a writ of CERTIORARI or any other appropriate writ, order or direction quashing the impugned summons issued under Section 50 of the PMLA, 2002 by the 2nd respondent vide Summon No. PMLA/ SUMMON/VKSZO/2025/790/673, PMLA/SUMMON/VKSZO/2025/791/674, PMLA/SUMMONA/KSZO/2025/ 792/675 and PMLA/ SUMMON/VKSZO/2025/794/677 dated 23-08-2025 as arbitrary, illegal and unconstitutional apart from gross violation of Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India as illegal, arbitrary and in violation of Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India, and consequently QUASH/Set aside the same….” 2. Learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the Writ Petition. 3. Permission is accorded. 4. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, the miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this Writ Petition shall stand closed. _________________________ K. SREENIVASA REDDY, J. Date:06.02.2026 Asr 3 HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE K. SREENIVASA REDDY Writ Petition No.24060 of 2025 Date:06.02.2026 Asr