PAPPU YADAV @ PAPPU KUMAR YADAV v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND
B.A./360/2026 · 2026-02-24
Deepak Roshan
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 2414 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 2414 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
2026:JHHC:5397 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
B.A. No. 360 of 2026
--------- Pappu Yadav @ Pappu Kumar Yadav, aged about 28 years, s/o. Raja Ram Yadav, r/o. Talbanna, P.O. Sahibganj, P.S. Sahibganj (Muffasil), Dist. Sahibganj.
....Petitioner
Versus The State of Jharkhand
....Opp. Party
---------
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK ROSHAN
--------- For the Petitioner : Mr. Pratiush Lala, Advocate For the Opp. Party : Mr. S.K. Keshri, A.P.P.
--------- 02/ 24.02.2026 Heard learned counsels for the parties.
2. The instant bail application has been preferred by the petitioner for grant of regular bail for the offences registered under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 117(2), 118(1), 109, 3(5) of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita,
2023.
3.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is innocent and has been falsely implicated in this case. Learned counsel further submits that there is general and omnibus allegation against the petitioner. However, facts remains that four days prior to the institution of this case, the petitioner had lodged an FIR against the relatives (nephews) of the informant for making nuisance in the wine shop where the petitioner was working and hence, the informant has lodged the instant case against the petitioner just to harass him. He further submits that petitioner is languishing in custody since 08.10.2025; as such, the petitioner may be enlarged on bail. Learned counsel further submits that the petitioner is ready to abide by every condition imposed by this court.
4. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for bail of the petitioner.
5. Having regard to the facts of the case and looking to the allegation against the petitioner; I am inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. Accordingly, the petitioner is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand only)
2026:JHHC:5397 2 with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned A.C.J.M., Sahibganj in connection with Muffasil P.S. Case No. 55 of
2025.
6. It is made clear that the petitioner shall appear on each and every date before the learned trial court and if any adverse report will come against the petitioner, learned trial court shall be at liberty to cancel the bail of the petitioner.
(Deepak Roshan, J.) 24th February, 2026 kunal/- Uploaded on 25.02.2026