SATINDER AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS
CRWP/7056/2026 · 2026-06-12
Sandeep Moudgil
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 24138 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 24138 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
149 CRWP-7056-2026
Date of Decision: 12.06.2026 SATINDER AND ANOTHER ....PETITIONERS VS STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS .....RESPONDENTS
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP MOUDGIL Present:- Mr. Nirmal Singh, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Ved Parkash, Sr. DAG, Haryana. **** SANDEEP MOUDGIL, J.(ORAL) The jurisdiction of this Court has been invoked under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for directing the official respondents nos.2 and 3 to protect the life and liberty of the petitioners from the hands of private respondents and other relatives. Learned State counsel assures the Court that the representation dated 10.06.2026 (Annexure P-5) submitted by the petitioners will be decided within three days in the light of notification No.12/252/2023-4HG- IV dated 17.02.2025 issued by the Home Department, Haryana Government. In the light of above, the instant petition stands disposed of. However, the petitioners would be at liberty to avail alternate remedy by way of appeal as per the above-said SOP.
(SANDEEP MOUDGIL)
JUDGE 12.06.2026 Jyoti-V Whether her Speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No JYOTI 2026.06.13 11:08 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document