Kaverala Matchanna v. The Director of Tribal Welfare
WP/12155/2013 · 2026-02-04
Harinath N
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 24125 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 24125 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010476212013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] THURSDAY,THE FIFTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 12155/2013 Between:
1. KAVERALA MATCHANNA, S/O LATE BOJJU DORA, AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS, OCC: COOK AND KAMATI, T.W.A.H. SCHOOL, PEDAGUDA VILLAGE AND MUCHIGIPUT MANDAL, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT.
...PETITIONER AND
1. THE DIRECTOR OF TRIBAL WELFARE, DSS BHAVAN, MASAB TANK, HYDERABAD.
2. THE PROJECT OFFICER ITDA PADERU VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT, -
3. THE COLLECTORCUMCHAIRMAN ITDA VISAKHAPATNAM, DISTRICT, VISAKHAPATNAM.
4. T W A H SCHOOL REP BY ITS HEAD MASTER PEDAGUDA, MUNMCHINGIPUT MANDAL, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT.
...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue an appropriate Writ, Order or Direction, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, to declare the action of the respondent No.1 in not obtaining the absorption and regularization orders into Last Grade Service Cadre inspite of the receipt of the proposals from the 2nd respondent vide Rc.No. B3/464/2002 dt. 24.6.2008, as being illegal, arbitrary and against
2
to the principles of natural justice and consequently direct the respondent authorities to regularize the services of the petitioner in the clear existing vacancy and to pay the salaries attached to the said post on par with regular employees, and to pass such other order or orders as this Hon'ble Court may deems fit just and proper in the circumstances of the case.
IA NO: 1 OF 2013(WPMP 15040 OF 2013 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased the respondent No.I herein to forthwith regularize the services of the petitioner in the clear existing vacancy as mentioned in the proposals sent by the 2nd respondent vide Rc.No. B3/464/2002 dt. 24.6.2008, pending disposal of the main Writ Petition, pending disposal of the above writ petition and to pass such other order or orders as this Hon'ble Court may deems fit just and proper in the circumstances of the case. Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. KAUSHIK KUMBHAJADALA Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. K DURGA PRASAD(SC FOR APRS SW)
2. GP FOR SOCIAL WELFARE The Court made the following:
3
Order:-
1. There is no representation for the petitioner.
2. The petitioner is seeking a direction for regularizing his service, as a proposal was sent by the respondent No.2 on 24.06.2008. No counter is filed.
3. However, the Learned Assistant Government Pleader submits that the petitioner has attained the age of superannuation pending the writ petition.
4. On these considerations, this writ petition is closed. There shall be no
order as to costs.
As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. ____________________ JUSTICE HARINATH.N
05.02.2026 RMD
4
216
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N
WRIT PETITION NO: 12155/2013
05.02.2026 RMD