Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 2412 (ALL)

SHARIK AALAM v. STATE OF U.P.

BAIL/13887/2026 · 2026-05-04

Krishan Pahal

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 13887 of 2026 Court No. - 65 (Sr. No.49 out of 205) HON'BLE KRISHAN PAHAL, J. 1. List has been revised. 2. Heard Sri Kulveer Singh, learned counsel for the applicant, Sri Manish Mishra, learned counsel for the informant, Sri Deepak Kumar Singh, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the material placed on record. 3. Applicant seeks bail in Case Crime No.310 of 2025, under Sections 69, 351(3), 351(2) BNS, Police Station Chhapar, District Muzaffarnagar, during the pendency of trial. 4. As per prosecution story, the applicant is stated to have established corporeal relationship with the victim on the false promise of marriage and subsequently abandoned her, thereby going back on the said promise. The victim is stated to have reached the house of the applicant and was thereby informed that the applicant had gone abroad. 5. Learned counsel for the applicant has argued that the applicant is absolutely innocent and has been falsely implicated in the present case. He has nothing to do with the said offence. The victim is major aged about 24 years. There is no clinching evidence to suggest that the applicant misled the victim from the beginning. The informant has converted a failed consensual physical relationship into a criminal case. The applicant has no criminal history and is in jail since 09.03.2026. He undertakes to cooperate with the trial and not misuse the liberty of bail. Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Kulveer Singh Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : Anil Kumar Mishra, G.A., Manish Mishra Sharik Aalam .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. .....Opposite Party(s) 6. Learned counsel for the informant and learned A.G.A. have vehemently opposed the bail application. 7. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, submissions made by learned counsel for the parties, the evidence on record, taking into consideration that the victim is major and there being no clinching evidence to suggest that the applicant misled the victim from the beginning, and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, prima-facie the Court is of the view that the applicant has made out a case for bail. The bail application is allowed. 8. Let the applicant- Sharik Aalam, be released on bail on furnishing a personal bond and two sureties to the satisfaction of the court concerned, subject to verification of sureties, with the conditions that he shall not tamper with evidence or intimidate witnesses and shall appear before the trial court as required. 9. Breach of any condition shall entail cancellation of bail. The observations herein shall not affect the trial on merits. May 5, 2026 (Ravi Kant) BAIL No. 13887 of 2026 2 (Krishan Pahal,J.) Digitally signed by :- RAVI KANT High Court of Judicature at Allahabad