APHC010477072025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3233] MONDAY, THE NINTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B KRISHNA MOHAN WRIT PETITION NO: 25172/2025 Between: 1. BOLLINI DINAKAR BABU, S/O. JAYARAM NAIDU, AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS, OCC. BUSINESS, R/O. DOOR NO. 1- 176/AL, LAKSHMINAGAR, PUTTUR VILLAGE AND POST, PUTTUR MANDAL, TIRUPATI DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, AT VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI, ANDHRA PRADESH 2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, TIRUPATI DISTRICT, TIRUPATI. 3. THE REVENU DIVISIONAL OFFICER, TIRUPATI DIVISION, TIRUPATI DISTRICT. 4. THE TAHSILDAR, PUTTUR MANDAL, TIRUPATI DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue a writ more particularly in the form of writ of Mandamus declaring the inaction of the Respondents in mutating my name in revenue records i.e., Adangal and Form-IB ROR and to issue digital Pattadar Passbook cum title deed book in the name 2 of the petitioner for the land an extent of Ac.3-52 cents in Sy.No.74 of Puttur Village Accounts, mandal, Tirupati District (formerly Chittoor District) even thoughPuttur the petitioner's right and title has been declared by way of the decree and Judgment of competent civil court is illegal and arbitrary and Land and Pattadar Passbooks against the provisions of A.P. Rights in 1971 and violative of article 14, 21, 300-A of Constitution of India Act, and consequently direct the Respondents to delete the said land from prohibition list U/S.22-A of Registration Act, 1908 for the land an extent of Ac.3-52 cents in Sy.No.74 of Puttur village accounts, Puttur Mandal, Tirupati District and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to direct the 2ND Respondent to delete the said land an extent of A.3-52 cents in Sy. No. 74 Puttur Village Accounts, Puttur mandal, Tirupati District (formerly Chittoor District from the prohibition list and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. K KRANTI CHAITANYA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR REVENUE 3 The Court made the following Order: The learned counsel for the petitioner seeks withdrawal of the writ petition, for which letter was also filed. 2. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Interim order, if any, deemed to have been vacated. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, Miscellaneous Petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _________________________ JUSTICE B KRISHNA MOHAN 09.03.2026 NNN