LOVEPREET SINGH AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS
CRWP/6931/2026 · 2026-06-10
Sandeep Moudgil
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 24113 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 24113 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT 126
LOVEPREET SINGH AND ANOTHER
STATE OF PUNJAB CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP MOUDGIL Present: Ms. Gurpreet Kaur, Advocate f Mr. Satnam Preet Singh Chauhan, DAG, Punjab. SANDEEP MOUDGIL, J.(ORAL)
The jurisdiction of this Court has been invoked under Article 226 of the Constitution of India and liberty of the petitioners from the hands of respondent nos.4 to 7. Learned State counsel assures the Court that the representation dated 06.06.2026 (Annexures P three days in the light of notification No.HOMEHM dated 23.01.2025 issued by the Department of Home Affairs, Punjab, Government of Punjab (Home-4 Branch). In the light of above, the instant petition stands However, the petitioners would be at liberty to avail alternate remedy by way of appeal as per the above
June 10, 2026 Poonam Sharma
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
LOVEPREET SINGH AND ANOTHER
STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP MOUDGIL Ms. Gurpreet Kaur, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Satnam Preet Singh Chauhan, DAG, Punjab. ****** SANDEEP MOUDGIL, J.(ORAL) The jurisdiction of this Court has been invoked under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for directing the official respondents to protect the life and liberty of the petitioners from the hands of respondent nos.4 to 7. Learned State counsel assures the Court that the representation dated 06.06.2026 (Annexures P-1) submitted by the petitioner three days in the light of notification No.HOMEHM dated 23.01.2025 issued by the Department of Home Affairs, Punjab, Government 4 Branch). In the light of above, the instant petition stands However, the petitioners would be at liberty to avail alternate remedy by way of appeal as per the above-said SOP. Whether speaking/reasoned? Whether Reportable? OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRWP-6931-2026 Date of decision: 10.06.2026
..PETITIONERS VS. ..RESPONDENTS HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP MOUDGIL
petitioners. Mr. Satnam Preet Singh Chauhan, DAG, Punjab. The jurisdiction of this Court has been invoked under Article 226 of for directing the official respondents to protect the life and liberty of the petitioners from the hands of respondent nos.4 to 7. Learned State counsel assures the Court that the representation dated 1) submitted by the petitioners will be decided within three days in the light of notification No.HOMEHM-40 40SECM/14/2025-2H4/63 dated 23.01.2025 issued by the Department of Home Affairs, Punjab, Government In the light of above, the instant petition stands disposed of.
However, the petitioners would be at liberty to avail alternate remedy (SANDEEP MOUDGIL)
JUDGE Yes/No Yes/No
The jurisdiction of this Court has been invoked under Article 226 of for directing the official respondents to protect the life Learned State counsel assures the Court that the representation dated s will be decided within 2H4/63 dated 23.01.2025 issued by the Department of Home Affairs, Punjab, Government However, the petitioners would be at liberty to avail alternate remedy POONAM SHARMA 2026.06.11 19:32 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document