1 2026:CGHC:26691 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 4065 of 2022 1 - M/s M N Roy And Sons, Indian Oil Dealer A Partnership Firm Through Partner Prabir Kumar Naha Roy, P.O. Haldibari (Chirmiri), P.S. Chirmiri,, District : Koriya (Baikunthpur), Chhattisgarh. ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - Union Of India Through The Ministry Of Commerce And Industries The Udyod Bhawan, New Delhi. 2 - Dy. Chief Controller Of Explosives Petroleum And Explosives Safety Organisation (Peso) Central Secretariat Building A-Wing, 5th Floor, Sector 24, Atal Nagar, Nawa Raipur, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 3 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of Food And Civil Supplies, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 4 - The Collector Korea, District : Koriya (Baikunthpur), Chhattisgarh. 5 - Indian Oil Corporation Ltd. Through The Senior Divisional Manager, Divisional Officer, Vip Road, P.O. Ravigram, Telibandha, Raipur (C.G.). ... Respondent(s) RAGHVENDRA JAT Digitally signed by RAGHVENDRA JAT 2 For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Raj Shengale, Advocate. For Respondent(s)/UOI : Mr. Ramakant Mishra, DSGI. For Respondent/State : Mr. Amit Nayak, Panel Lawyer. Hon’ble Mr. Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad Order on Board 30/06/2026 1. By way of this petition, the petitioner has prayed for following reliefs:- “10.1 Issue an appropriate writ and quash the order impugned dated 28.07.2022 (Annexure P/1). 10.2 Or in alternate, issue an appropriate writ and ask the respondent No.: 2 to consider withdrawal of the order dated 28.07.2022 in view of the finding recorded by the respondent No.: 4 towards petitioner having no title over the site concerned having already been stayed by the State Government, resulting into natural revival of the status immediately prior thereto. 10.3 Grant any other relief, which is deemed fit in the circumstances of the case.” 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that with the afflux of time, the petition has been rendered infructuous. 3. No objection has been raised from other sides. 4. Accordingly, the present writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. Sd/- (Amitendra Kishore Prasad) Judge Raghu Jat