DR. ATUL SAXENA SON OF PYARE LAL SAXENA v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CRLMB/4852/2026 · 2026-04-22
Praveer Bhatnagar
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 2411 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 2411 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2026:RJ-JP:17090] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 4852/2026 Dr. Atul Saxena Son Of Pyare Lal Saxena, Aged About 62 Years, Resident Of Plot No. 02, Flat No. 202, Vinayak Bihar, Iskcon Road, Baad Mohanpur, Mansarovar, Jaipur (Rajasthan). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Public Prosecutor. ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ayush Gupta For Respondent(s) : Mr. Rhishi Raj Singh Rathore, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAVEER BHATNAGAR
Order 22/04/2026
1. Apprehending his arrest in connection with FIR No. 327/2025 registered at Police Station Sadar, Jaipur District Jaipur (West) for the offences under Sections 318(4), 338, 336(3) and 340(2) of BNS, the accused-petitioner has preferred the anticipatory bail application under Section 482 BNSS.
2.
Learned counsel for the accused-petitioner submits that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in the present case. It is further contended that, vide order dated 07.04.2026, the petitioner was granted interim protection and was directed to appear before the concerned Investigating Officer along with relevant documents. Counsel further submits that the petitioner has complied with the said order by appearing before the Investigating Officer and furnished all the relevant documents. The petitioner is ready and willing to cooperate with the
[2026:RJ-JP:17090] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-4852/2026] investigation. It is also argued that, prima facie, no offence is made out against the petitioner, as he neither examined the disability of Kavita Yadav nor issued any certificate in her favour, therefore, anticipatory bail application of the accused-petitioner may be allowed. 3. Learned Public Prosecutor vehemently opposes the bail application and submitted the factual report alongwith the case diary. 4. Heard and perused the material available on record. 5. As per the factual report, although the SSO ID of the present petitioner was used, the disability certificate of Kavita Yadav was neither signed by the petitioner, nor did the petitioner examine her disability. The accused-petitioner is ready and willing to cooperate with the investigation, therefore without commenting anything on the merits of the case, I deem it just and proper to allow the anticipatory bail application of the accused-petitioner. 6. Accordingly, the anticipatory bail application under Section 482 BNSS is allowed and it is ordered that in the event of arrest of the petitioner namely- Dr. Atul Saxena Son Of Pyare Lal Saxena, in connection with FIR No. 327/2025 registered at Police Station Sadar, Jaipur District Jaipur (West) he shall be released on bail, provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the S.H.O/I.O/Arresting Officer of the concerned Police Station on the following conditions:- (i) that the petitioner shall make himself available for interrogation by a police officer as and when required;
[2026:RJ-JP:17090] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-4852/2026] (ii) that the petitioner shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the court or any police officer, and (iii) that the petitioner shall not leave India without previous permission of the court.
(iv) that the petitioner shall submit his present address to the concerned investigating officer. In case of any change in the present address then also he will intimate the same to the concerned Investigating Officer. (PRAVEER BHATNAGAR),J ashu /60