Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 2411 (GAU)

INTAJ ALI @ INTAZ ALI KHAN AND 6 ORS. v. THE STATE OF ASSAM

I.A.(Crl.)/212/2026 · 2026-03-22

Mitali Thakuria

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/5 GAHC010035982026 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : Crl.A./86/2026 INTAJ ALI @ INTAZ ALI KHAN AND 6 ORS. S/O IDRISH @ IDRICH ALI KHAN, R/O VILL- KOTHALGURI, P.S.- KOKRAJHAR, DIST- KOKRAJHAR, ASSAM 2: HATEM ALI KHAN S/O YUSUB ALI KHAN R/O VILL- KOTHALGURI P.S.- KOKRAJHAR DIST- KOKRAJHAR ASSAM 3: MIZANUR ALI S/O LATE SAYED ALI R/O VILL- BORO BODHAIGURI P.S.- KOKRAJHAR DIST- KOKRAJHAR ASSAM 4: HASINUR ALI S/O LATE SAYED ALI SK. R/O VILL- BORO BODHAIGURI P.S.- KOKRAJHAR DIST- KOKRAJHAR ASSAM 5: MAFIZUL ALI S/O LATE LALTO SK R/O VILL- BORO BODHAIGURI P.S.- KOKRAJHAR DIST- KOKRAJHAR ASSAM 6: ANARUL ALI S/O MD. ALI Page No.# 2/5 R/O VILL- BORO BODHAIGURI P.S.- KOKRAJHAR DIST- KOKRAJHAR ASSAM 7: HAFIZUL SK. S/O SAYED SK. R/O VILL- BORO BODHAIGURI P.S.- KOKRAJHAR DIST- KOKRAJHAR ASSA VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, ASSAM Advocate for the Petitioner : S K PODDAR, R MANDAL,MR. R GHOSH,MS. N PODDAR,MR. C SHARMA Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM, Linked Case : I.A.(Crl.)/212/2026 INTAJ ALI @ INTAZ ALI KHAN AND 6 ORS. S/O IDRISH @ IDRICH ALI KHAN R/O VILL- KOTHALGURI P.S.- KOKRAJHAR DIST- KOKRAJHAR ASSAM 2: HATEM ALI KHAN S/O YUSUB ALI KHAN R/O VILL- KOTHALGURI P.S.- KOKRAJHAR DIST- KOKRAJHAR ASSAM 3: MIZANUR ALI S/O LATE SAYED ALI R/O VILL- BORO BODHAIGURI Page No.# 3/5 P.S.- KOKRAJHAR DIST- KOKRAJHAR ASSAM 4: HASINUR ALI S/O LATE SAYED ALI SK. R/O VILL- BORO BODHAIGURI P.S.- KOKRAJHAR DIST- KOKRAJHAR ASSAM 5: MAFIZUL ALI S/O LATE LALTO SK R/O VILL- BORO BODHAIGURI P.S.- KOKRAJHAR DIST- KOKRAJHAR ASSAM 6: ANARUL ALI S/O MD. ALI R/O VILL- BORO BODHAIGURI P.S.- KOKRAJHAR DIST- KOKRAJHAR ASSAM 7: HAFIZUL SK. S/O SAYED SK. R/O VILL- BORO BODHAIGURI P.S.- KOKRAJHAR DIST- KOKRAJHAR ASSAM VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR ASSAM ------------ Advocate for : S K PODDAR Advocate for : PP ASSAM appearing for THE STATE OF ASSAM Page No.# 4/5 BEFORE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE MITALI THAKURIA ORDER Date : 23.03.2026 Heard Mr. S.K. Poddar, learned counsel for the appellant. Also heard Mr. P. Borthakur, learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for State respondent. 2. This is an appeal filed under Section 430 of the BNSS, 2023 for suspension of sentence and to allow the petitioners to remain on previous bail during the pendency of the appeal. 3. It is submitted by Mr. Poddar, learned counsel for the appellant that by the Judgment and Order dated 20.01.2026 the learned Sessions Judge, Chirang in Sessions Case No. 20/2025 had convicted the accused/appellant under Section 61/115/140(3) of BNS and sentenced them to pay a fine of Rs.10,000/- each for the offence under Section 115 BNS in default to suffer simple imprisonment for 1 month and undergo simple imprisonment of 2 years for the offence under Section 140 (3) BNS with fine of Rs.5,000/- each in default to suffer imprisonment for 1 month and undergo simple imprisonment of 2 years for the offence under Section 61 BNS with fine of Rs.5,000/- each in default to suffer further imprisonment for 1 month. 4. The learned counsel for the appellant has submitted that the petitioner is still in previous bail and accordingly he is praying for allowing him to remain on previous bail till disposal of the connected appeal and suspending the sentence imposed upon him vide the said Judgment and order. 5. Mr. P. Borthakur, learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for State respondent raised no objection in that regard. Page No.# 5/5 6. In view of this, the present interlocutory application is hereby allowed and the applicant/appellant is hereby allowed to remain on previous bail till the disposal of the connected appeal and the order and sentence passed in the Judgment is suspended till the disposal of the connected appeal. 7. With the above observation, this Interlocutory Application stands disposed of. JUDGE Comparing Assistant