Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2026 DAILYLAW 24105 (PNJ)

SATTO AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

CRWP/6902/2026 · 2026-06-10

Sandeep Moudgil

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA 124 SATTO AND ANOTHER STATE OF HARYANA CORAM: Present: SANDEEP MOUDGIL, J.(ORAL) of India has been filed for dir and liberty of petitioners at the ha 2. they will be satisfied, in case a direct Commissioner of Police, Faridabad 02.06.2026 (Annexure P 3. No.2-the Commissioner of Police, Faridabad decide the representatio opportunity of hearing to the parties, by passing a speaking order in IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH SATTO AND ANOTHER VS. STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP MOUDGIL Mr. Sarvesh Kumar Gupta, Advocate Mr. Sudesh Kumar, Advocate for the Mr. Ved Prakash, Sr. DAG, Haryana. ****** SANDEEP MOUDGIL, J.(ORAL) This Criminal Writ Petition Under Article 226 of Constitution of India has been filed for directing the respondent no 1 to 3 and liberty of petitioners at the hands of private respondents no. 4 to 7 At the outset, learned counsel for the petitioner will be satisfied, in case a direction is issued to respondent No.2 Commissioner of Police, Faridabad to de 02.06.2026 (Annexure P-3) within a time bound manner. Without adverting to the merits Commissioner of Police, Faridabad decide the representation dated 02.06.2026 (Annexure P opportunity of hearing to the parties, by passing a speaking order in IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA CRWP-6902-2026 (O&M) Date of decision: 10.06.2026 ..PETITIONERS ..RESPONDENTS HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP MOUDGIL , Advocate and or the petitioners. Haryana. This Criminal Writ Petition Under Article 226 of Constitution ecting the respondent no 1 to 3 to ensure life f private respondents no. 4 to 7. At the outset, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that ion is issued to respondent No.2- the to decide the representation dated ) within a time bound manner. Without adverting to the merits of the case, the respondent Commissioner of Police, Faridabad is directed to consider and n dated 02.06.2026 (Annexure P-3), after providing opportunity of hearing to the parties, by passing a speaking order in This Criminal Writ Petition Under Article 226 of Constitution to ensure life s submits that the cide the representation dated of the case, the respondent and ), after providing POONAM SHARMA 2026.06.11 19:32 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document CRWP-6902 accordance with law within a period of two weeks from the date of receip certified copy of this order. 4. 4. seven days thereafter. 5. June 10, 2026 Poonam Sharma 6902-2026 (O&M) accordance with law within a period of two weeks from the date of receip certified copy of this order. A copy of order so passed be supplied to the petitioner seven days thereafter. Petition stands disposed of in the aforesaid terms. June 10, 2026 Poonam Sharma Whether speaking/reasoned? Whether Reportable? -2- accordance with law within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of A copy of order so passed be supplied to the petitioners within Petition stands disposed of in the aforesaid terms. (SANDEEP MOUDGIL) JUDGE Yes/No Yes/No t of within POONAM SHARMA 2026.06.11 19:32 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document