Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 24103 (KAR)

MR. RAGHU T v. THE TAHASHILDAR

WP/19490/2025 · 2026-06-23

E S Indiresh

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:30981 WP No. 19490 of 2025 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 23RD DAY OF JUNE, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH WRIT PETITION NO.19490 OF 2025 (KLR-RES) BETWEEN: 1. MR. RAGHU T. S/O RAJANNA AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS R/AT NO.OPPOSITE VISHWANATHA TEMPLE, MADDUR ROTARY, MALAVALLI MAIN ROAD, MADDUR - 571428 KARNATAKA. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. NALINI. T., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE TAHASHILDAR TALUK OFFICE, CHANNAPTNA TALUK, RAMANAGAR. 2. THE REVENUE INSPECTOR TALUK OFFICE, CHANNAPTNA TALUK - 562160 RAMANAGAR. 3. THE VILLAGE ACCOUNTANT HANUMARURA DODDI VILLAGE Digitally signed by CHAYA S A Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:30981 WP No. 19490 of 2025 2 TALUK OFFICE, CHANNAPTNA TALUK, RAMANAGAR. 4. THE POLICE SUB INSPECTOR M.K.DODDI, POLICE STATION TALUK OFFICE, CHANNAPTNA TALUK, RAMANAGAR. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. SPOORTHY HEGDE N., HCGP ) THIS WP IS FILED PRAYING TO1. DIRECTION TO THE RESPONDENT NO. 1, 2 AND 3 TO FURNISH THE SURVEY REPORT SO FOR DONE PERTAINING TO THE SURVEY NUMBER 80 TO 86; AND ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH ORAL ORDER Heard the learned counsel appearing for the parties. 2. In this writ petition, the grievance of the petitioner is with regard to the clearing of the encroachment over the road based on the complaint dated 29.01.2025 submitted by the petitioner, as per Annexure-D4. - - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:30981 WP No. 19490 of 2025 3 3. Having heard the learned counsel appearing for the parties and upon careful consideration of the averments made in Annexure-D4, it is noticed that a representation has been submitted to Respondent No. 1 seeking appropriate action in the matter. 4. In that view of the matter, Respondent No. 1 is directed to remove the encroachment, if any, after conducting survey if required, found to be contrary to the village map produced at Annexure-C and the records available in its office, in accordance with law. While removing the encroachment, it is open to Respondent No.1-Thasildar, to seek the assistance of Respondent No. 4-jurisdictional police, if necessary. Accordingly, the writ petition stands disposed of. In view of the disposal of the writ petition, any pending applications do not survive for consideration and are accordingly disposed of. SD/- (E.S.INDIRESH) JUDGE SB List No.: 1 Sl No.: 14