IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRWP-6832-2026(O&M) Date of decision: 08.06.2026 Harjit Singh Bassi @ Harjit Singh … Petitioner Versus State of Punjab and others … Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP MOUDGIL Present: Mr. Sandeep Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Gorav Kathuria, DAG, Punjab. *** SANDEEP MOUDGIL, J. (ORAL) This is a petition under Article 226/227 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a direction to official respondents to protect the life and liberty of the petitioner from the hands of respondents No.5 & 6. 2. At the outset, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he will be satisfied, in case a direction is issued to respondent No.3-the Commissioner of Police, Jalandhar to decide the representations dated 11.03.2026 (Annexure P-4) and dated 02.06.2026 (Annexure P-5) within a time bound manner. 3. Without adverting to the merits of the case, the respondent No.3-the Commissioner of Police, Jalandhar is directed to consider and decide the representations dated 11.03.2026 (Annexure P-4) and dated 02.06.2026 (Annexure P-5), after providing opportunity of hearing to the parties, by passing a speaking order in accordance with law within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order. RAJAN 2026.06.12 11:35 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRWP-6832-2026(O&M) 2 4. A copy of order so passed be supplied to the petitioner within seven days thereafter. 5. Petition stands disposed of in the aforesaid terms. ( SANDEEP MOUDGIL ) JUDGE June 8, 2026 Rajan Whether speaking / reasoned: Yes/No Whether Reportable: Yes/No RAJAN 2026.06.12 11:35 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document