KUSH SHARMA S/O KEDAR SHARMA v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CRLMB/1579/2026 · 2026-03-17
Sangeeta Sharma
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 241 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 241 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2026:RJ-JP:11290] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 1579/2026 Kush Sharma S/o Kedar Sharma, R/o Village Athferiya, Police Station Kanchanpur, District Dholpur. (Presently Confined At District Jail Dholpur) ----Accused-Petitioner Versus State of Rajasthan, Through Public Prosecutor ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Jitendra Pandey For Respondent(s) : Mr. Tapesh Agarwal, PP Mr. Puneet Prajapat for Mr. Amitabh Jatav HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SANGEETA SHARMA
Order 17/03/2026
1. This bail application has been filed on behalf of the accused- petitioner under Section 483 of B.N.S.S. in connection with FIR No. 344/2025 registered at Police Station Kanchanpur, District Dholpur for the offence(s) under Section(s) 109(1), 352, 3(5) of BNS and under Section 3/25 of Arms Act.
2.
Learned counsel for the accused-petitioner submits that the accused-petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case and the accused-petitioner is behind the bars since 15.12.2025. He further submits that charge-sheet against the accused-petitioner has already been filed. He further submits that the injuries sustained by the injured are neither fatal nor dangerous to life and conclusion of trial will take its own time, so no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping the accused-petitioner in custody and
[2026:RJ-JP:11290] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-1579/2026] therefore, prays that the accused-petitioner may be granted the benefit of bail under Section 483 of BNSS.
3. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor vehemently opposes the submissions made by learned counsel for the accused-petitioner hereinabove.
4. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and the
arguments advanced by learned counsel for the parties that the accused-petitioner is behind the bars since 15.12.2025. Charge-sheet against the accused-petitioner has already been filed. There are no criminal antecedents against the accused-petitioner. The injuries sustained by the injured are neither fatal nor dangerous to life. Trial will take its own time. Without expressing any opinion on the merits/demerits of the case, this Court deems it just and proper to enlarge the accused-petitioner on bail.
5. Therefore, this bail application under Section 483 BNSS is accordingly, allowed and the accused-petitioner Kush Sharma S/o Kedar Sharma is ordered to be released on bail, provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs. 1,00,000/- with two sureties of Rs. 50,000/- each to the satisfaction of the trial Court, with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court and any court to which the matter is transferred on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so.
6. Office is directed to send a copy of this order to the concerned trial Court through e-mail/fax, for necessary compliance.
(SANGEETA SHARMA),J KAVISH/73