Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2026 DAILYLAW 24097 (PNJ)

SANDEEP SINGH AND ANR v. STATE OF PUNJAB AND ORS

CRWP/6866/2026 · 2026-06-10

Sandeep Moudgil

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 122 SANDEEP SINGH AND ANOTHER STATE OF PUNJAB CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP MOUDGIL Present: Mr. Neeraj Jain, Advocate f Mr. Satnam Preet Singh Chauhan, DAG, Punjab. SANDEEP MOUDGIL, J.(ORAL) The present petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking the issuance of directions to Respondents No. 2 and 3 to protect the life and liberty of the petitioners and to restrain Private Respondents No. 4 to 9 from harassing or interfering in the peaceful life of the petitioners. The petitioners further seek appropriate directions to Respondent No. 2 to consider their representation dated 05.06.2026 and to provide necessary protection to their life and liberty from Respondents No. 4 to 9 and other members of their family. After argu withdrawal of the present petition. Prayer is accepted. Dismissed as withdrawn. June 10, 2026 Poonam Sharma IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH SANDEEP SINGH AND ANOTHER VS. STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP MOUDGIL Mr. Neeraj Jain, Advocate for the petitioner Mr. Satnam Preet Singh Chauhan, DAG, Punjab. ****** SANDEEP MOUDGIL, J.(ORAL) The present petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking the issuance of directions to Respondents No. 2 and 3 to protect the life and liberty of the petitioners and to restrain Private Respondents No. 4 to 9 from harassing or interfering in the peaceful life of the petitioners. The petitioners further seek appropriate directions to Respondent No. 2 to consider their representation dated 05.06.2026 and to provide necessary protection to their life and liberty from Respondents No. 4 to 9 and other members of their family. After arguing for some time, learned counsel for the petitioners seeks withdrawal of the present petition. Prayer is accepted. Dismissed as withdrawn. Whether speaking/reasoned? Whether Reportable? IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRWP-6866-2026 Date of decision: 10.06.2026 ..PETITIONERS ..RESPONDENTS HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP MOUDGIL petitioners. Mr. Satnam Preet Singh Chauhan, DAG, Punjab. The present petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking the issuance of directions to Respondents No. 2 and 3 to protect the life and liberty of the petitioners and to restrain Private Respondents No. 4 to 9 from harassing or interfering in the peaceful life of the petitioners. The petitioners further seek appropriate directions to Respondent No. 2 to consider their representation dated 05.06.2026 and to provide necessary protection to their life and liberty from Respondents No. 4 to 9 and other members of their family. ing for some time, learned counsel for the petitioners seeks (SANDEEP MOUDGIL) JUDGE Yes/No Yes/No The present petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking the issuance of directions to Respondents No. 2 and 3 to protect the life and liberty of the petitioners and to restrain Private Respondents No. 4 to 9 from harassing or interfering in the peaceful life of the petitioners. The petitioners further seek appropriate directions to Respondent No. 2 to consider their representation dated 05.06.2026 and to provide necessary protection to their ing for some time, learned counsel for the petitioners seeks POONAM SHARMA 2026.06.11 19:32 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document