Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Himachal Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 2409 (HP)

SIKANDER LAL v. State of HP

CRMPM/279/2026 · 2026-03-13

Virender Singh

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2026:HHC:6982 IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. Cr.MP(M) No. 279 of 2026 Reserved on : 12.03.2026 Decided on : 13.03.2026 Sikander Lal …Applicant Versus State of Himachal Pradesh …Respondent Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Virender Singh, Judge. Whether approved for reporting? For the applicant      :  Mr. Vijender Katoch, Advocate. For the respondent   : Mr. Tejasvi   Sharma   &   Mr. H.S. Rawat, Additional A.Gs. Virender Singh, Judge Applicant­Sikander   Lal   has   filed   the   present application  under   Section   483   of   the   Bharatiya   Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (hereinafter referred to as ‘BNSS’), for releasing him, on bail, during the pendency of the trial, arising out of FIR No. 36/2025, dated 28.03.2025, under 2 2026:HHC:6982 Sections 21 and 25 of the Narcotic Drugs & Psychotropic Substances Act (hereinafter referred to as the ‘ND&PS Act’), registered   with  Police   Station   Damtal,  District   Kangra, H.P. 2. According to the applicant, he is innocent person and has falsely been implicated, by the police, in this case. 3. According   to   him,   the   investigation,   in   the present case, is complete and the trial against him although, commenced, but, the same has not yet been concluded. It has been pleaded that only three PWs could be examined by the prosecution and case is now listed for 17.04.2026, for further evidence. 4. The   contraband   allegedly   recovered,   in   the present case, according to the applicant, does not fall within the   definition   of   ‘commercial   quantity’,   as   such,   the provisions of Section 37 of ND&PS Act are not applicable, in the present case. 5. According   to   the   applicant,   apart   from   the present case, five other cases have been registered against him, particulars of which, have been mentioned in para No. 3 2026:HHC:6982 8 of the application, which are reproduced, as under:­ 1. FIR   No.   22/2015,   dated   22.09.2015,   under Sections 341, 323, 504, 34 of IPC, Police Station Damtal; 2. FIR   No.   137/2020,   dated   16.09.2020,   under Section 22 of ND&PS Act, Police Station Damtal; 3. FIR   No.   212/2020,   dated   10.10.2020,   under Section 21, 22 of ND&PS Act of Police Station Div. No. 2 Pathankot, Punjab; 4. FIR   No.   39/2023,   dated   21.03.2023,   under Section 21 of ND&PS Act, Police Station Damtal; 5. FIR   No.   104/2024,   dated   04.09.2024,   under Section 21 of ND&PS Act, Police Station Damtal. 6. It   is   the   further   case   of   the   applicant   that although, the cases have been registered against him, but, he has not been convicted, in any of these cases, by the competent Court of Law. 7. The   applicant   has   tried   his   luck   earlier   by moving application before this Court bearing Cr.MP(M) No. 2261   of   2025,   which   was   dismissed   as   withdrawn   on 11.09.2025. Thereafter,   he   has   moved   the   application before the Court of learned Special Judge, Nurpur, District Kangra, H.P., which was also dismissed on 12.01.2026. 8. On the basis of the grounds as taken in the bail application, Sh. Vijender Katoch, learned Counsel appearing 4 2026:HHC:6982 for the applicant, has given certain undertakings, on behalf of the applicant, for which, the applicant is ready to abide by,   in   case,   ordered   to   be   released   on   bail,   during   the pendency of the trial. 9. On the basis of the above facts, a prayer has been made to allow the bail application. 10. When,   put   to   notice,   the   police   has   filed   the status report, disclosing therein, that on 28.03.2025, HC Hem Raj, I.O. ANTF FU CID Kangra, submitted a rukka to Police   Station   Damtal,   disclosing   therein   that   on 28.03.2025,   he   along   with   other   police   officials,   in   his private vehicle bearing No. HP36D­0401, was on duty to detect the crime relating to excise, was present in Mohtali Ramp,  near  Damtal. At about 11:45  am,  he  received  a secret information  about the  fact that one  person, along with motorcycle bearing No. PB55B­9840, is standing on the link road leading to village Sirat. The name of said person is stated to be Sikander and he is resident of Sirat and he was having  Chitta,  which he had kept in speedometer  of his motorcycle and he was present there in order to sell the 5 2026:HHC:6982 same to someone. 10.1 As per the secret information, if the said person is nabbed, large quantity of Chitta could be recovered. The said information was found to be authentic and reliable and according to I.O., if he obtains the search warrants, in that eventuality, delay could be caused and the contraband may be removed from there. As such, the I.O. has prepared the information   under   Section   42(2)   of   ND&PS   Act   and submitted   the   same   to   Dy. S.P.   Indora. Thereafter,   he proceeded to the spot. 10.2 When, the I.O., along with the police officials, turned towards the katcha passage to Village Sirat, then, he noticed one person standing there, upon which, I.O. directed the driver to stop the vehicle and inquired the name of said person. On   inquiry,   said   person   disclosed   his   name   as Shivam Katoch son of Sh. Sanjay Katoch. He was apprised about   the   secret   information   and   he,   along   with   HC Jagvikrant, was associated as independent witness. 10.3 At about 12:40, in the noon, when the  police party reached at the spot, as per the secret information, 6 2026:HHC:6982 then,  the  said  person  along   with  motorcycle  bearing   No. PB55B­9840, was found standing there. The I.O. thereafter gave his personal identification, as well as, identification of the  police  officials,  upon  which,  the  said  person  became perplexed and tried to flee away by starting his motorcycle, but, he was nabbed. On inquiry, he disclosed his name as Sikander   Lal   (applicant). He   could   not   give   satisfactory answer for fleeing away. 10.4 Thereafter, his motorcycle was checked and near the speedometer, a blue and white coloured plastic box was found,   which,   on   checking,   was   found   containing   black coloured plastic envelope. When the knot of the same was untied,   the   same   was   found   containing   dark   brown   and white   coloured   granular   shaped   substance,   which,   on checking   with   drug   detection   kit,   was   found   to   be heroin/chitta. On weighment, the said chitta was found to be 6.08 grams. The contraband was taken into possession. 10.5 Other codal formalities were completed. Rukka was   prepared   and   submitted   to   the   Police   Station. After registration of FIR, accused (applicant) was arrested. The 7 2026:HHC:6982 contraband, thereafter, was produced before the Court of learned   JMFC   Indora,   from   where,   inventory   proceedings were   got   conducted. The   contraband   was   sent   to   FSL Junga, from where, positive report has been received. 10.6 The   investigation,   in   the   present   case,   is complete and challan has been filed in the Court, and out of 19 witnesses, 11 witnesses have already been examined and case   is   now   listed   on   17/18.04.2026,   for   recording   the statements of remaining PWs. 10.7 As per the police report, apart from the present case,   following   four   cases   were   found   to   be   registered against the applicant, the particulars of which have been reproduced, as under:­ 1. FIR   No.   137/2020,   dated   16.09.2020,   under Section 22 of ND&PS Act, Police Station Damtal; 2. FIR   No.   212/2020,   dated   10.10.2020,   under Section 21, 22 of ND&PS Act of Police Station Div. No. 2 Pathankot, Punjab; 3. FIR   No.   39/2023,   dated   21.03.2023,   under Section 21 of ND&PS Act, Police Station Damtal; 4. FIR   No.   104/2024,   dated   04.09.2024,   under Section 21 of ND&PS Act, Police Station Damtal. 10.8 On   the   basis   of   above   facts,   it   has   been apprehended that in case, the applicant is released on bail, 8 2026:HHC:6982 he   may   again   indulge   in   the   similar   activities   and   may coerce the witnesses. 10.9 On the basis of above facts, a prayer has been made to dismiss the application. 11. First of all, coming to criminal cases registered against the applicant, admittedly, in those cases, he has not been convicted by the Competent Court of Law, nor, the police has made any efforts to get the bail cancelled in the above noted cases, by moving appropriate application. 12. Moreover,   due   to   registration   of   those   cases, applicant cannot be kept in judicial custody for indefinite period, as he was arrested, in this case, on 28.03.2025 and trial against him has not yet been concluded, since, as per the   status   report,   case   is   listed   for   17/18.04.2026,   for prosecution   evidence. From   the   above   facts,   it   can   be concluded   that   the   chances   of   conclusion   of   the   trial, against the applicant, in near future, are not so bright, as such, no useful purpose would be served by keeping him in judicial custody. 13. Moreover, the bail application cannot be rejected 9 2026:HHC:6982 as   a   matter   of   punishment,   as   pre­trial   punishment   is prohibited under the law. 14. The contraband, allegedly recovered, in this case, from the possession of the applicant, does not fall within the definition of commercial quantity, as such, rigors of Section 37 of ND&PS Act, are not applicable, in the present case. 15. So far as the other apprehensions are concerned, for   those   apprehensions,   reasonable   conditions   can   be imposed in case the applicant is ordered to be released on bail. 16. Taking into consideration the period of custody, coupled with the fact that the challan has been filed in the Court,   this   Court   is   of   the   view   that   no   useful   purpose would   be   served   by   keeping   the   applicant   in   judicial custody. 17. Considering all these facts, this Court is of the view that the bail application is liable to be allowed and is accordingly allowed. 18. Consequently,   the   applicant   is   ordered   to   be released,   on   bail,   in   case  FIR   No.   36/2025,   dated 10 2026:HHC:6982 28.03.2025, registered under Sections 21 and 25 of the ND&PS Act, with Police Station Damtal, District Kangra, H.P.,  on his furnishing personal bond in the sum of Rs. 50,000/­,   with   two   sureties   of   the   like   amount,   to   the satisfaction of the learned trial Court. 19. This   order,   however,   shall   be   subject   to   the following conditions:­ “a) The applicant shall regularly attend the trial Court on each and every date of hearing and if prevented by any reason to do so, seek exemption from   appearance   by   filing   the   appropriate application; b)   The   applicant   shall   not   tamper   with   the prosecution evidence nor hamper the investigation of the case in any  manner whatsoever; c) The applicant shall not make any inducement, threat or promises to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade them from disclosing   such   facts   to   the   Court   or   the   Police Officer, and d)   The   applicant   shall   not   leave   the   territory   of India without the prior permission of the Court.” 20. Any of the observations, made hereinabove, shall not be taken as an expression of opinion, on the merits of the case, as these observations, are confined, only, to the disposal of the present bail application. 11 2026:HHC:6982 21. It is made clear that the respondent­State is at liberty to move an appropriate application, in case, any of the bail conditions, is found to be violated by the applicant. 22. The Registry is directed to forward a soft copy of the   bail   order   to   the   Superintendent   of   Jail,   Sub   Jail Nurpur,   District   Kangra   H.P.   through   e­mail,   with   a direction to enter the date of grant of bail in the e­prison software. 23. In case, the applicant is not released within a period  of  seven  days  from  the  date  of  grant  of  bail,  the Superintendent of Jail,  Sub  Jail  Nurpur,  District Kangra H.P., is directed to inform this fact to the Secretary, DLSA, Kangra. The   Superintendent   of   Jail,   Sub   Jail   Nurpur, District Kangra H.P. is further directed that if the applicant fails to furnish the bail bonds, as per the order passed by this Court, within a period of one month from today, then, the said fact be submitted to this Court. (Virender Singh) Judge 13th March, 2026 (Pramod Kumar) PRADEEP Digitally signed by PRADEEP Date: 2026.03.13 11:19:47 +0530