IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH SHIMLA CWP No. 16301 of 2026 along with CWP No. 16302 of 2026. Decided on : 23 rd September , 2026 1. CWP No. 16301 of 2026. Dinesh Kumar & Ors. ...Petitioners. Versus State of H.P. & Ors. ....Respondents. 2. CWP No. 16302 of 2026. Pawan Vikram Singh & Ors. ...Petitioners. Versus State of H.P. & Ors. ....Respondents. Coram: Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the Petitioners: Mr. Bhpinder Thakur and Ms. Ranjana Sharma, Advocates. For the respondents: Mr. Y.P.S. Dhaulta, Additional Advocate General. Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge. Notice. Mr. Y.P.S. Dhaulta, learned Additional Advocate General appears and waives service of notice on behalf of the respondents. 2. Petitioners’ grievance is that their representations (Annexure P-6 Colly. in both the petitions), seeking applicability of Dinesh Kumar & 1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2 Ors. vs. State of H.P. & Ors.2 have not been decided till date by the respondents/competent authority. Learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the petitioners would be content in case the respondents/competent authority(s) are directed to consider and decide the aforesaid representations in accordance with law within a fixed-time schedule. Learned Additional Advocate General is not averse to this prayer. 3. Having regard to the afore-submissions, but without examining the merits of the matter, this writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondents/competent authority to consider and decide the aforesaid representations of the petitioners in accordance with law as well as taking into consideration the above judgment within a period of six weeks from today. The decision so arrived at shall also be communicated to the petitioners. The writ petition stands disposed of in the above terms, so also the pending miscellaneous application(s), if any. Jyotsna Rewal Dua Judge 23rd September, 2026. (jai) 2CWP No. 1747 of 2023, decided on 09.10.2023