Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 24075 (JHR)

M/S. VINOD KUMAR JAIN, THROUGH ITS AUTHORIZED SIGNATORY, KULDEEP JAIN v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND, THROUGH ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, ROAD CONSTRUCTION DEPARTMENT

WPC/6376/2026 · 2026-08-25

Deepak Roshan

Writ Petition (Civil)body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

( 2026:JHHC:25596-DB ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(C) No. 6376 of 2026 M/s Vinod Kumar Jain, a registered partnership firm, having its Head Office at College Road, Jashpur Nagar, P.O. and P.S. Jashpur Nagar, District Jashpur, State of Chhatisgarh, PIN No. 496331, through its Authorized Signatory, Kuldeep Jain, aged about 52 years, son of Late Tarachand Jain, resident of Raj Bhawan Apartment, 101A, Kamlakant Road, Opposite Gaushala Chowk, Harmu Road, Upper Bazar, P.O. G.P.O., P.S. Kotwali, District Ranchi 834001 (Jharkhand). ….. …. Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand, through its Principal Secretary, Road Construction Department, having its office at Project Building, Dhurwa, P.O. Dhurwa, P.S. Jagannathpur, District Ranchi (Jharkhand), PIN 834004. 2. Engineer- in Chief, Road Construction Department, having its office at Jharkhand Mantralaya (Project Bhawan), P.O. Dhurwa, P.S. Jagannathpur, District Ranchi-834004 (Jharkhand). 3. Chief Engineer Road Construction (Communication), Department, having its office at Engineers' Building, 1st Floor, P.O. and P.S. Dhurwa, District Ranchi (Jharkhand). PIN-834004. 4. Shivalaya Construction Limited, having its office at Plot No. 137, Pocket 10, Sector-24, Rohini, P.O. Rohini and P.S. Rohini, District New Delhi. ….. …. Respondents ------ CORAM : HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK ROSHAN ------ For the Petitioner : Mr Sumeet Gadodia, Advocate Ms Shilpi Sandil Gadodia, Advocate Ms Shruti Shekhar, Advocate Ms Nidhi Lall, Advocate For the Respondents : Mr Vibhor Mayank, AC to AG ----- 02 /Dated: 25.08.2026 1. Mr Gadodia, the learned counsel for the petitioner, based on instructions, seeks leave to withdraw this petition with liberty to raise all permissible contentions, including, the contentions raised in this petition (if permissible) and W.P.(C) No. 4823 of 2026, in which the present petitioner has been impleaded as respondent. 2. Leave is granted with liberty as prayed for by keeping all contentions of all parties open. 3. This petition is disposed of with liberty in the above terms and no costs. (M.S. Sonak, C.J.) (Deepak Roshan, J.) August 25, 2026 Ranjeet / R.Kr. /uploaded on 27.08.2026