Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 24075 (CAL)

KAZI ZIYARUL RAHAMAN v. STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS.

WPA/12357/2026 · 2026-06-18

Saugata Bhattacharyya

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

28 1188..0066..22002266 Ct. No. 05 adeb WPA 12357 of 2026 Kazi Ziyarul Rahaman Vs. The State of West Bengal & Ors. Mr. Amitava Chowdhury ….for the petitioner Mr. Suryaneel Das Ms. Anita Kundu Ms. Sumita Sarkar …for the State 1. Affidavit of service filed on behalf of the petitioner is taken on record. 2. In the writ petition, petitioner prays for direction upon the concerned police authorities for registering FIR based on complaint lodged before the concerned police authorities. 3. Mr. Das, learned Additional Government Pleader representing State respondents has filed a communication dated 17th June, 2026 of Officer-in-Charge, Memari Police Station and same is taken on record. Copy of the communication dated 17th June, 2026 is made over to the learned advocate representing petitioner. 4. It is disclosed in the communication dated 17th June, 2026 that taking note of two separate complaints two FIRs were registered one is 2 Memari P.S. Case No. 426/26 dated 2nd June, 2026 and another is Memari P.S. Case No. 460/26 dated 9th June, 2026. Since two separate FIRs are registered thereby initiating criminal prosecutions at this stage no further order need be passed on this writ petition. 5. However, concerned police authorities are directed to take criminal prosecutions to logical conclusion by submitting reports before the jurisdictional Magistrate at an early date. 6. Writ petition stands disposed of. 7. Urgent photostat certified copy of the order, if applied for, be given to the parties, upon usual undertakings. (Saugata Bhattacharyya, J.)