IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Writ Jurisdiction Case No.316 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-394 Year-2025 Thana- ROH District- Nawada ====================================================== 1. Nitu Kumari D/o- Jayindra Prasad Village- Bajwara, P.s- Roh, District- Nawada 2. Kundan Kumar S/o- Jayindra Prasad Village- Bajwara, P.s- Roh, District- Nawada ... ... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State of Bihar through the Additional Chief Secretary, Department of Home, Govt. of Bihar,Patna Bihar 2. The Deputy Director General of Police, Govt. of Bihar, Gaya Ji Bihar 3. The Superintendent of Police, Nawada Bihar 4. The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Nawada Bihar 5. The SHO, Roh, Nawada Bihar 6. Gore Lal S/o- Late Sargun Prasad R/v- Patwasari Ps- Kadirganj Dist- Nawada ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Ms. Alka Panday, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. Nagendra Prasad Yadav, SC-23 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN KUMAR JHA ORAL ORDER 2 09-07-2026 Heard learned counsels for the parties. 2. The present writ petition has been filed seeking following reliefs: “i. For issuance of a writ/ writs, order/ directions for quashing the FIR bearing Roh P.S. Case No.-394/2025 registered U/s 126(2)/ 115(2)/ 110/303(2)/352/351(2)/3(5) of BNS as same is false, malice and lodged with ulterior motives at the instance of the Respondent No.-6. ii. For issuance of a writ in the nature of mandamus for directing and commanding the respondents to not take any coercive action against the petitioners and also conduct a fair and proper Patna High Court CR. WJC No.316 of 2026(2) dt.09-07-2026 2/2 investigation of Roh P.S. Case No.- 394/2025. iii. For issuance of any other writ/ writs, order/ orders, direction/ directions which may be deem fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case.” 3. At the outset, learned counsel for the State respondents submits that counter-affidavit has been filed on behalf of the respondent no. 3, wherein it has been submitted that the Police investigated the matter and finding no evidence a closure report has been submitted before the learned trial Court and petitioners have not been sent up for facing trial. 4. Since the prayer of the petitioners stand satisfied, the writ petition is disposed of. Shahnawaz/- (Arun Kumar Jha, J) U T