WP(MD). No.7956 of 2026 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT Dated : 25/03/2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MUMMINENI SUDHEER KUMAR WP(MD). No.7956 of 2026 Muruganantham.I. ... Petitioner Vs. The Managing Director, Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation (Msu) Ltd., Bye-Pass Road, Madurai. ... Respondent PRAYER :- Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents to disburse the earned leave salary for 135 days surrendered by the petitioner from the year 2011, together with interest at the rate of 6 percent per annum till the date of actual payment to be made by the respondents, by considering the petitioners representation dated 12.03.2026. For Petitioner : Mr.SP.Vijaynivas For Respondent : Mr.S.Gidian Micheal Rajadurai ORDER This writ petition has been filed for issuance of writ of mandamus directing the respondents to disburse the Earned Leave salary for 135 1/9 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP(MD). No.7956 of 2026 days surrendered by the petitioners from the year 2011, together with interest at the rate of 6% per annum till the date of actual payment to be made by the respondents, by considering the petitioner's representation dated 12.03.2026. 2. By consent of both parties, the writ petition is taken up for final disposal at the admission stage itself. 3.The case of the petitioner is that in terms of the settlement arrived under Section 12 (3) of the ID Act, the employees of the respondent Corporation are entitled to surrender Earned Leave of 15 days in one year or 30 days in 2 years and the remaining 15 days, or 30 days as the case may be, can be accumulated as terminal Earned Leave upto maximum of 240 days. 4. The petitioner herein, who has retired from service, was allowed to encash 240 days of of Earned Leave. However, the petitioner claims that he has 135 days more Earned Leave available, which were earned by him during the period 2011 to 2016. But the petitioner was not allowed 2/9 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP(MD). No.7956 of 2026 to encash the said Earned Leave at the relevant point of time due to financial crisis being faced by the respondent Corporation. Hence, he claims that he is entitled to encash the same, but the respondent Corporation is not allowing him to encash. Hence, he contend that the petitioner is entitled for encashment of the Earned Leave that is available to his credit and for payment of the same with interest at 6% per annum. 5. At the threshold, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner has brought to the notice of this Court that the very same issue has fallen for consideration before this Court in WP(MD)No.2449 of 2018 and a coordinate bench of this Court by order dated 02.04.2018 allowed an identical claim under identical fact situation. A copy of the same is also placed before this Court. It is also further brought to the notice of this court that the said order of the learned single Judge of this Court dated 02.04.2018 was also confirmed by a Hon'ble Division Bench of this Court in WA(MD)No. 210 of 2019 by order dated 04.01.2019. 6. The learned Standing Counsel appearing for the respondent Corporation also has not disputed about the said legal position. 3/9 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP(MD). No.7956 of 2026 7. In the light of the same, this Court does not find any reason to re-adjudicate the matter once again. In WP(MD)No.2449 of 2018 at paragraph Nos.11 to 14 this Court held as under: ''11. It is not in dispute that there was 12(3) settlement between the parties. According to such settlement, employees would be entitled to surrender earned leave of 15 days in one year or 30 days in two years and the remaining 15 days or 30 days, as the case may be, shall be cumulatively accumulated as terminal earned leave benefit to the maximum of 240 days for the whole service. 12. As far as the petitioner's case is oncerned, during his service, between 2011 and 2014, though he could have surrendered the earned leave of 15 days in a year as per 12(3) settlement, the same was not made possible because the practice was done away by the respondent Corporation, as they have admitted in the answer given to the query under RTI Act. That is the reason why the respondent Corporation in the recent circular dated 09.01.2017 has given the following option to the employee: “nghUs;: 2011 Kjy; 2014 tiuapyhd Mz;L xd;Wf;F 15 ehl;fs; <l;ba tpLg;ig xg;gilg;G nra;ayhk; vd midj;J gzpahsh;fSf;Fk; njhptpf;fg;gLfpwJ.Xt;nthU Mz;Lk; 15 ehl;fs; Koikahf xg;gilg;G nra;a KbAk; vd;Wk; (15 ehl;fSf;F Fiwthf <l;ba tpLg;G xg;gilg;Gnra;a ,ayhJ) kw;Wk; xg;gilg;G nra;j 15 ehl;fs; Nghf kPjp me;j Mz;by; 30 ehl;fs; 4/9 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP(MD). No.7956 of 2026 <l;ba tpLg;G ifapUg;gpy; ,Uf;f Ntz;Lk;. NkYk; tpUg;Ghpik gbtj;ij xt;nthU Mz;Lf;Fk; jdpj;jdpNa G+h;j;jp nra;J fpis Nkyhsh;%yk; rkh;g;gpf;f Ntz;Lk; vd njhptpf;fg;gLfpwJ. ” 13. If the present circular dated 09.01.2017 enabling the employees to surrender earned leave of 15 days per year for the original period between 2011 and 2014, certainly, such benefits should be extended to all such employees. Insofar as the present petitioner is concerned, the petitioner also could not surrender his earned leave between 2011 and 2014 and therefore, the petitioner would be entitled to make such a claim by virtue of the Circular. Moreover, when a similar issue has been raised, by similarly placed employees before this Court in the order cited supra in A.Sundararajan v. The Tamil Nadu State Transport corporation (Kumbakonam Limited) and another, the learned Judge, after having considered these issues, has allowed the said writ petition by making the following observations and findings, which are extracted hereunder for easy reference: “4.Learned standing counsel appearing for the respondents would contend that it is not in dispute that the petitioners are entitled to earned leave surrender salary and it has to be ascertained as to whether they have made any claim for disbursement of the said salary in the respective years, as there is no reference either in the affidavit as well as in the typed set of papers with regard to 5/9 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP(MD). No.7956 of 2026 the forwarding of any better/ application, claiming the said amount. He has further submitted that it has to be ascertained as to whether the period for which leave salary is claimed in these writ petitions have been included in the final settlement of surrender leave salary of 240 days after their retirement. Moreover, the respondents/Corporation have been undergoing severe economical crisis, which is also one of the reasons for not releasing the amount. 5.The financial crisis cannot be the ground to deprive the benefit of earned leave surrender salary to the petitioners, especially, when the claim of earned leave surrender salary for 15 days per year or 30 days once in two years has been admitted in the settlement effected under Section 12(3) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. 6.Therefore, the respondents are directed to consider the claim of the petitioners for payment of the earned leave surrender salary in respect of the years 2010-2014 and pay the eligible amount to the petitioners as per the commitment made by the respondents under section 12(3) settlement within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.” 6/9 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP(MD). No.7956 of 2026 14. Having considered the said judgment of this Court as well as the said Circular dated 09.01.2017, this Court is of the considered view that the petitioner shall also be eligible and entitled to surrender 15 days earned leave from the years 2011- 2014, where the petitioner was in service and if such surrender is made, certainly, he will be entitled to claim the encashment for the said earned leave surrender''. The above order of the learned single Judge was confirmed by the Hon'ble Division Bench in WA(MD)No. 210 of 2019 vide order dated 04.09.2019. 8. In the light of the above, the entitlement of the petitioner to encash the available Earned Leave to the credit to the petitioner cannot be denied. Further, as the petitioner is deprived of encashing the same at the relevant point of time, he is also entitled to receive the amounts due and payable on encashment with interest at the rate of 6% per annum. 9. Accordingly, the writ petition is allowed directing the respondents to permit the petitioner to encash the Earned Leave available to the credit of the petitioner and disburse the amount payable thereunder together with interest at the rate 6% per annum from the date 7/9 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP(MD). No.7956 of 2026 of superannuation till the date of realization as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within a period three months from the date of receipt of a copy of a copy of this order. No costs. 25.03.2026 Index : Yes/No Internet : Yes/No CM TO The Managing Director, Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation (Msu) Ltd., Bye-Pass Road, Madurai. 8/9 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP(MD). No.7956 of 2026 MUMMINENI SUDHEER KUMAR, J CM WP(MD) No.7956 of 2026 Date : 25/03/2026 9/9 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis