REENA SATTI v. JAMMU MUNICIPAL CORPORATION TH ITS COMMISSIONER AND OTHERS
WP(C)/2528/2026 · 2026-08-12
Rajnesh Oswal
Writ Petition (Civil)body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 2407 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 2407 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU
WP(C) No. 2528/2026
Reena Satti
…..Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s)
Through: Mr. Vishal Goel, Advocate.
vs
Jammu Municipal Corporation and Ors. .…. Respondent(s)
Through: Ms. Monika Thakur, Advocate vice Mr. Ravinder Gupta, AAG.
Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJNESH OSWAL, JUDGE
ORDER 12.08.2026
1.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in terms of order dated 02.05.2026 issued by respondent No. 1, saloon of the petitioner situated at the 1st floor of Plot No. 211, Sector 2, Channi Himmat, Jammu has been sealed by the respondents illegally. He further submits that the petitioner regarding her grievance has submitted the detailed representation dated 04.05.2026 to respondent No. 1 but the same has not been decided till date. He further submits that respondent No. 1 be
directed to decide the same within a stipulated period.
2. Notice.
3. Notice is waived by Ms. Monika Thakur, Advocate appearing vice Mr. Ravinder Gupta, learned AAG on behalf of the respondents. She submits that representation filed by the petitioner shall be decided by respondent No. 1 as expeditiously as possible.
4. In view of above, the present petition is disposed of by directing respondent No. 1 to decide the representation dated 04.05.2026 filed by Serial No. 186
2 WP(C) No. 2528/2026
the petitioner within a period of 15 days from the date of receipt of this
order.
5. Needless to say that the petitioner shall submit this order to respondent No. 1 alongwith representation stated to have been filed by the petitioner.
(RAJNESH OSWAL)
JUDGE
Jammu 12.08.2026 Neha-1
Neha Kumari 2026.08.13 10:58 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document