Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 24057 (CHH)

SMT. CHITRAREKHA KAUSHIK v. PARMESHWAR SAHU

WP227/402/2022 · 2026-06-30

Shri Ravindra Kumar Agrawal

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2026:CGHC:26985 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WP227 No. 402 of 2022 1 - Smt. Chitrarekha Kaushik W/o Late Shri Mathura Prasad Kaushik Aged About 45 Years R/o Village Parsada, Tahsil And, District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh 2 - Ku. Yamini Kaushik D/o Late Shri Mathura Prasad Kaushik Aged About 21 Years R/o Village Parsada, Tahsil And, District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh 3 - Harsh Kaushik S/o Late Shri Mathura Prasad Kaushik Aged About 19 Years R/o Village Parsada, Tahsil And, District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - Parmeshwar Sahu S/o Shri Malikram Sahu R/o Village Mangla (Pasid), Tahsil Bilha, District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh 2 - Shri Nanku @ Ashok Kumar S/o Latel Gond R/o Village Mangal (Pasid), Tahsil Bilha, District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh 3 - Branch Manager I.C.I.C.I. Lombard Motor Insurance V.R. Plaza, Link Road, Bilaspur Chhattisgarh. ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Achyut Tiwari, Advocate SUMIT KUMAR Digitally signed by SUMIT KUMAR Date: 2026.07.02 10:56:46 +0530 2 (Hon’ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal, J.) Order on Board 01/07/2026 1. At the outset, learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the grievance of the petitioner has already been settled as their fixed deposit amounts have already been matured and they have received the same from the concerned bank, and therefore, he does not want to press the present writ petition. 2. On the submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioner, the present writ petition is dismissed as not pressed. Sd/- (Ravindra Kumar Agrawal) JUDGE Sumit