IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH **** 116 CRWP-6917-2026 Date of Decision:11.06.2026 Rohit and Another …..Pe++oners Vs. State of Haryana and Others .….Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK GUPTA Present:- Ms. Pallavi Babar, Advocate and Mr. Kushager Goyal, Advocate for the peoners. **** DEEPAK GUPTA, J. (ORAL) The two peoners are residing in live-in-relaonship. Peoner No.1 is married and having minor son; whereas peoner No.2 is unmarried. It is submi)ed that peoner No.1 has already filed divorce peon against his wife (Annexure P-4). Alleging that father and brother of peoner No.2 i.e. respondent Nos.4 and 5 are threatening the life and liberty of the peoners, the peoners have now sought necessary protecon through respondent Nos.1 to 3. Noce of moon to respondent Nos.1 to 3 only. Mr. Karanveer Singh, Senior DAG, Haryana accepts noce on behalf of respondent Nos.1 to 3- State. Learned State counsel submits that on ge5ng the representaon from the peoners, statement of respondent Nos.4 and 5 NEETIKA TUTEJA 2026.06.11 17:41 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRWP-6917-2026 -2- were recorded and both of them have stated that they will not cause any harm to the peoners and that they have no objecon with relaonship of the peoners. In view of the aforesaid statement made by learned State counsel, learned counsel for the peoners submit that peon may be disposed of. In view of above, there appears to be no longer any threat percepon to life and liberty of peoner and so, there is no need to pass any order for grant of protecon. Disposed of. (DEEPAK GUPTA) JUDGE June 11, 2026 Neeka Tuteja Whether Speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No NEETIKA TUTEJA 2026.06.11 17:41 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document