Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2026 DAILYLAW 24050 (PNJ)

PAHLAD SINGH v. STATE OF HARYANA

CRM-M/31551/2026 · 2026-06-11

Deepak Gupta

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CRM-M-31551-2026 [1] IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-31551-2026 Date of decision: 11.06.2026 Pahlad Singh ...Pe oner Versus State of Haryana ...Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK GUPTA Present: Mr. Hitesh Pandit, Advocate for the pe oner. **** DEEPAK GUPTA, J. (ORAL) By way of this pe on filed under Sec on 483 BNSS, prayer is made for grant of regular bail in case FIR No.33 dated 01.03.2025, under Sec on 20(b)(ii)(c) of the NDPS Act, registered at Police Sta on Loharu, District Bhiwani. 2. As per the allega ons, 1 kg 360 grams of Charas was recovered from the possession of one Kuldeep, who in his disclosure statement nominated one Naveen as the supplier. Said Naveen upon his interroga on disclosed the name of the pe oner to be the supplier of the contraband. 3. Learned counsel submits that pe oner has been apprehended only on the basis of statement of co-accused Naveen. He has nothing to do with the case. He is neither named in the FIR nor is any other case pending against him. 4. No ce of mo on. 5. Mr. Gautam Kailey, DAG, Haryana, appears for the State and submits the custody cer ficate. Learned State counsel concedes that pe oner has been nominated only on the basis of disclosure statement of co-accused Naveen and that there is no other evidence against him. It is also conceded by learned State counsel that though pe oner was earlier YOGESH MEHTA 2026.06.11 17:26 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRM-M-31551-2026 [2] involved in one case bearing FIR No.84 of 2020 under Sec ons 25 and 29(A) of the NDPS Act, but he has since been acqui=ed in that case. 6. Custody cer ficate further reveals that pe oner is in custody for the last five months. 7. Although the contraband recovered from co-accused Kuldeep falls in the commercial category, but having regard to the fact that no recovery has been effected from the pe oner and he has been nominated only on the basis of the disclosure statement of co-accused, the present pe on is accepted. Pe oner is ordered to be released on bail on his furnishing bail bonds and surety bonds to the sa sfac on of learned Trial Court/CJM/Duty Magistrate concerned, on usual terms and condi ons. 11.06.2026 (DEEPAK GUPTA) Yogesh JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned:- Yes/No Whether reportable:- Yes/No YOGESH MEHTA 2026.06.11 17:26 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document