APHC010473422015 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3460] TUESDAY,THE TENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY WRIT PETITION NO: 2880/2015 Between: 1. THE GANDHI CO-OPERATIVE URBAN BANK LTD., KRISHNA DIST., GOVERNORPET, VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT. REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, JAMPALA MURALIDHARA RAO, S/O. LATE NAGESWARA RAO, AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS, R/ O. MARUTHI NAGAR, VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. REGISTRAR A P COOP TRIBUNAL HYD 2 ORS, VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT. REP. BY ITS REGISTRAR. 2. THE ARBITRATOR, THE GANDHI CO-OPERATIVE URBAN BANK LTD., GOVERNORPET, VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 3. SMT SINGAVRUKSHAM LAKSHMI, W/O. LATE SRIMAN NARAYANA, AGE ABOUT 60 YEARS, OCC: HOUSEWIFE, R/O. D.NO.59A-21/3-2/7, FF-3, VENKATA SAI RESIDENCY, VIJAY NAGAR COLONY, PATAMATA, VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 2 ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ or direction declaring the order of the 1st respondent passed in 0A.No.10/2013, dt.5.9.2014, as illegal, arbitrary IA NO: 1 OF 2015(WPMP 3852 OF 2015 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay the order of the 1st respondent passed in 0A.No.10/2013, dt.5.9.2014, pending disposal of the writ petition Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. O MANOHER REDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR COOPERATION (AP) The Court made the following: 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY WRIT PETITION No.2880 OF 2015 O R D E R: The present Writ Petition is filed questioning the order passed by Respondent No.1 in O.A.No.10/2013, dated 05.09.2014, as illegal and arbitrary. 2. Learned proxy counsel for the Petitioner submits that the Petitioner/Bank has informed about appointing another Standing Counsel. 3. Considering the fact that this Writ Petition was adjourned earlier on four occasions, i.e., on 21.11.2025, 19.12.2025, 23.01.2026, and 05.02.2026, though the Writ Petition is of the year 2015, this Court is not inclined to adjourn the case further. Therefore, the Writ Petition is closed, leaving it open to the Petitioner to agitate the case if they so desire by filing appropriate applications. As a sequel, pending applications, if any, shall stand closed. ________________________ JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY Date : 10.02.2026 chs 4 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY 62 WRIT PETITION No. 2880 of 2015 Date : 10.02.2026 chs