[2026:JHHC:25751] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No.8021 of 2026 ------ Sunil, Aged about – 28 Years, Son of – Om Prakash, Resident of village – Dhanupura, Post Office- Kakrala, Police Station- Kadar Chowk, District- Budaun, State Uttar Pradesh .... .... …. Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand .... .... Opposite Party ------ CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Raja Ravi Shekhar Singh, Advocate For the State : Mr. Sardhu Mahto, Addl.P.P ------ Order No.02 Dated-27-08-2026 Heard the parties. The petitioner has been made accused in connection with Nimiaghat P.S. Case No.111 of 2025 registered for the offences punishable under Section 305(a), 331(4) of the B.N.S., 2023. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner looted the gold and silver jewelry worth Rs. 15 lakhs from the shop of the informant. It is submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false. It is further submitted that the petitioner has only been implicated in this case on the basis of confessional statement of the co-accused Shyam Shunder made in connection with Suti P.S. Jangipur (Murshidabad) (W.B) Case No. 1376 of 2025. It is also submitted that the petitioner has been implicated in this case on the basis of suspicion and no recovery has been made. It is then submitted that though the petitioner is not named in the F.I.R. yet without putting him on Test Identification Parade as has been mentioned in paragraph-11 of the instant bail application, charge-sheet has been submitted against the petitioner. It is further submitted that the co- accused, with similar allegations, has already been admitted to bail by this Court vide order dated 12.08.2026 passed in B.A. No.7553 of 2026. It is then submitted that the petitioner undertakes that he will co-operate with the trial of the case and that he will not annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. It is lastly submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 27.02.2026 as has been mentioned in para-01 of the instant bail application. Hence it is submitted that the petitioner be released on bail. Learned Addl. P.P. opposes the prayer for bail. Considering the facts of this case, the above-named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate-1st Class, Giridih in connection with Nimiaghat P.S. Case No.111 of 2025 with the condition that he will co-operate with the trial of the case, furnish his mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card in the court below with an undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case and will not annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Dated-27.08.2026-Animesh/