209 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-18784-2026 DECIDED ON:10.06.2026 SUKHVEER .....PETITIONER VERSUS STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS .....RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE SANDEEP MOUDGIL CORAM: HON’BLE MS.JUSTICE RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL Present: Mr. Sourabh Sheoran, Advocate for the petitioner Mr. Sourabh Goel, Addl. AG. Haryana SANDEEP MOUDGIL , J. The jurisdiction of this Court has been invoked under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of a writ in the nature of Mandamus directing the respondent No.2 to take up the revision petition and stay application, Annexure P-4 and P-5, for hearing and pass appropriate order with regard to stay and in the meantime, dispossession of Petitioner from the land in his possession may kindly be stayed. Learned State counsel on instructions from respondent No.6/Block Development & Panchayat Officer, Satnali, District Mahendergarh informs the Court that respondents are not going ahead for demolition of the land in question as on date, since the revision petition is already pending adjudication. MEENU 2026.06.11 16:34 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CWP-18784-2026 -2- In view of the above, learned counsel for the petitioner do not press the instant petition any further and prays for withdrawal of the present petition at this stage. Prayer is accepted. Dismissed as withdrawn at this stage. (SANDEEP MOUDGIL) JUDGE (RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL) JUDGE 10.06.2026 Meenu 1. Whether speaking/reasoned? Yes/No 2. Whether reportable? Yes/No MEENU 2026.06.11 16:34 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document