Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 24024 (KAR)

DEVARAJAMMANNI S v. STATE OF KARNATAKA

CRL.P/7705/2019 · 2026-06-23

Ravi V Hosmani

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:31209 CRL.P No. 7705 of 2019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 23RD DAY OF JUNE, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI V HOSMANI CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 7705 OF 2019 BETWEEN: 1. DEVARAJAMMANNI S W/O S S NAGARAJU AGED ABOUT 47 YEAS GOWTHAM CIRCLE SIDDAIAHNAPURA VILLAGE CHANDAKAVADI HOBLI ATTAGULIPURA CHAMARAJANAGAR TALUK CHAMARAJANAGAR DISTRICT - 571 277 2. BHAGYA R S W/O B S SHIVAKUMAR AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS BACHAHALLI VILLAGE GUNDLUPETE TALUK CHAMARAJANAGAR DISTRICT - 571 111 3. MANJULA S. W/O B N DINAKARA AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS NO.66, 2ND MAIN 3RD PHASE, SHARADADEVI NAGAR MYSORE - 570 022 4. S S NAGARAJ S/O SIDDAIAH AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS Digitally signed by SHARADAVANI B Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:31209 CRL.P No. 7705 of 2019 GOWTHAM CIRCLE SIDDAIAHNAPURA VILLAGE CHANDAKAVADI HOBLI ATTAGULIPURA CHAMARAJANAGAR TALUK CHAMARAJANAGAR DISTRICT - 571 277 5. B S SHIVAKUMAR S/O R SIDDAIAH AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS NO.7/A, SHEKAR NILAYA 6TH MAIN, 1ST STAGE S D NAGARA MYSORE - 570 022 6. DINAKARA S/O B R NARAYANASWAMY AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS NO.686, 2ND 2ND MAIN II FLOOR, SHARADADEVI NAGAR MYSORE - 570 022 7. SIDDAIAH S/O LATE BOKKALAIAH AGED ABOUT 76 YEARS R/AT RAMASWAMY LAYOUT KARINANJANAPURA NEW EXTENTION CHAMARAJANAGAR TOWN CHAMARAJANAGAR - 571 313 8. MAHADEVAMMA W/O SIDDAIAH AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS R/AT RAMASWAMY LAYOUT KARINANJANAPURA NEW EXTENTION - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:31209 CRL.P No. 7705 of 2019 CHAMARAJANAGAR TOWN CHAMARAJANAGAR - 571 313 …PETITIONERS (BY SMT. PAVANA B.K., ADVOCATE FOR SRI. PRATHEEP K.C., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA BY CHAMARAJANAGAR WOMEN POLICE STATION CHAMARAJANAGAR DISTRICT REP BY SPP HIGH COURT BUILDING BANGALORE-01 2. UDAYAVANI PANDITH W/O NANDAKISHOR NO.12/221, HOUSING BOARD CHAMARAJANAGAR - 571 277 …RESPONDENTS (BY SMT. SOWMYA R., HCPG FOR R1 SRI. V.M. PRASAD, ADVOCATE FOR R2) THIS CRL.P IS FILED U/S 482 OF CR.P.C. BY THE ADVOCATE FOR THE PETITIONER PRAYING THAT THIS HONOURABLE COURT MAY BE PLEASED TO QUASH THE FIR AGAINST THE PETITIONER IN CR.NO.19/2019 OF CHAMARAJANAGARA WOMEN POLICE STATION, CHAMARAJANAGARA DISTRICT, FOR THE OFFENCE P/U/S 498(A), 323, 506, 114 R/W 34 OF IPC ON THE FILE OF ADDITIONAL CIVIL JUDGE (SR.DN.) AND C.J.M., CHAMARAJANAGARA. - 4 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:31209 CRL.P No. 7705 of 2019 THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI V HOSMANI ORAL ORDER Challenging FIR in Crime No.19 of 2019 registered by Chamarajanagar Women Police Station, Chamarajanagar, for offences punishable under Sections 498(A), 323, 506, 114 read with Section 34 of Indian Penal Code, 1860 presently on file of Additional Civil Judge, Senior Division and Chief Judicial Magistrate, Chamarajanagar, this petition is filed. 2. Smt. Pavana B.K. learned counsel appearing for Pratheep K.C., advocate for petitioners submitted that petitioners herein were accused no.2 to 9. It was submitted that petitioners no.7 and 8 were parents-in-law of complainant, while other petitioners were relatives of husband of complainant. It was submitted that marriage of complainant with Nanda Kishore (accused no.1) was solemnized on 23.11.2015. However, marriage did not - 5 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:31209 CRL.P No. 7705 of 2019 run smoothly and led to filing of complaint impugned herein and Nanda Kishore filing M.C.no.5/2019 before Family Court at Mysuru and there was settlement between complainant and her husband (arrayed as accused no.1 herein). It was further submitted that accused no.1 had filed Crl.P.No.4776/2022 before this Court. Same was allowed on 17.08.2022 and proceedings against accused no.1 quashed. Present proceedings in CC no.6/2020 on file of Additional Senior Civil Judge and CJM., Chamarajanagar were arising from very same complaint. 3. It was further submitted matter was referred for mediation wherein parties had agreed for settlement on 15.02.2022. Terms of settlement were drawn into an agreement under Section 89 of CPC. In view of above, proceedings against other accused could not be continued and sought for allowing petition. 5. Learned HCGP for respondent and learned counsel for complainant would not dispute submissions. - 6 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:31209 CRL.P No. 7705 of 2019 6. In view of above, since proceedings against accused no.1 have been quashed by this Court in Crl.P no.4776/2022 on 17.08.2022, as well as on ground of settlement between parties to this petition on 15.02.2022, continuation of impugned proceedings would be futile and if not, abuse of process of law. Therefore, petition is allowed and proceedings in Cr.no.19/2019 registered by Chamarajanagar Women Police Station, Chamarajanagar, pending on file of Additional Civil Judge, Senior Division and Chief Judicial Magistrate, Chamarajanagar, in so far as petitioners (accused no.2 to 9) stand quashed. Sd/- (RAVI V HOSMANI) JUDGE PSJ List No.: 1 Sl No.: 28