1 2026:CGHC:7222 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 13105 of 2025 1 - Sunil Nayak S/o Late Shri Girish Nayak Aged About 40 Years R/o Behind Dus Nal, Santoshi Nagar, Tikrapara, Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.) --- Petitioner(s) versus 1 - The State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of Urban Administration And Development, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Naya Raipur (C.G.) 2 - The Raipur Municipal Corporation Through The Commissioner, Raipur (C.G.)... --- Respondent(s) (Cause title is taken from CIS system) For Petitioner : Dr. Shiv Kumar Shrivastava, Advocate For Respondent-State : Mr. Kalpesh Ruparel, P.L. For Respondent No.2 : Mr. Pankaj Agrawal, Advocate Hon'ble Shri Parth Prateem Sahu, Judge ORDER ON BOARD 09/02/2026 1. Petitioner has filed this petition seeking following relief (s) :- “10.1 Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to call the entire record of the Respondent Bank for proper and amicable disposal of this Writ Petition. 10.2 Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ directing the respondents to consider and grant promotion to the BALRAM PRASAD DEWANGAN Digitally signed by BALRAM PRASAD DEWANGAN Date: 2026.02.10 11:50:28 +0530 2 petitioner to the next higher post forthwith, with all consequential benefits including arrears of pay and seniority. 10.3 Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to issue a writ of mandamus directing the respondents to decide the petitioner’s pending representation in accordance with law within stipulated time. 10.4 Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to pass such further or other order (s) as this Hon’ble Court may deem fit in the interest of justice. 10.5 Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to allow cost of this petitioner from respondents. 10.6 Any other relief which may be deemed fit by this Hon’ble Court the direction for consideration of just and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case may also be given to the petitioner.” 2. Learned counsel for respondent No.2 would submit that main relief, which is sought by petitioner is for direction to consider and decide the representation submitted by petitioner for promotion. Representation submitted by petitioner was considered and decided on 02.02.2026. Copy of order on the representation is handed over to the learned counsel for petitioner. 3. In view of the above submission made by learned counsel for respondent No.2 nothing remains in this petition for adjudication. 4. Accordingly, this petition is disposed of in view of the submission made by learned counsel for respondent No.2 and also the order placed before this Court dated 02.02.2026. Sd/- (Parth Prateem Sahu) JUDGE Balram