APHC010462712022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] WEDNESDAY,THE SEVENTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 29296/2022 Between: 1. POLEPALLI HARINATH, S/ O LATE P.SIDDAIAH SETTY, AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS,R/O D.NO. 3-843-C, DIVYASREEAPARTMENT,JANAKIRAMKALYANAMANDAPAM, PUTTAPARTHYTOWN,SATYA SAI PUTTAPARTHY DISTRICT. 2. POLEPALLI RAJENDRA, S/O LATE P.SIDDAIAH SETTY, AGED ABOUT 48YEARS, R/O D.NO. 1-558-52-A, R.S.ROAD,KADIRITOWN,SATYA SAI DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT,SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, SATYA SAI PUTTAPARTHY DISTRICT, PUTTAPARTHY. 3. THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, PUTTAPARTHY RURAL POLICE STATION, KOTHACHERUVU,SATYA SAI PUTTAPARTHY DISTRICT. 4. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, PUTTAPARTHY, SATYA SAI PUTTAPARTHY DISTRICT. 5. KUMMATHA RAMESH, S/ O LATE K.SUBBANNA AGED ABOUT 41 YEAR, R/O YENUMULAPALLI VILLAGE, PUTTAPARTHY,SATYA SAI DISTRICT. 6. D THIPPA REDDY, S/O CHENNA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS, R/O BYRAPURAM VILLAGE, KOTHACHERUVUMANDAL, SATYA SAI DISTRICT. 7. GUDURU OBULESHU, S/O GUDURUVENKATRAMUDU, AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS, R/O PEDDAKAMMAVARI VILLAGE, PUTTAPARTHYMANDAL, SATYA SAI PUTTAPARTHY DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of mandamus declaring the action of the respondents 3 and 4 in 2 interfering with the civil disputes between the petitioners and respondents no. 5 to 7 is as illegal, arbitrary and violations of article 14, 21and 300-A of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents not to interfere in the civil disputes and pass Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. R SUJAN KUMAR Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME 3 The Court made the following: ORDER: This Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, has been filed, by the Petitioners for the following relief: < ... to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of mandamus declaring the action of the respondents 3 and 4 in interfering with the civil disputes between the petitioners and respondents 5 to 7 as illegal, arbitrary and violation of Articles 14, 21 and 300-A of the Constitution of India and consequently, direct the respondents not to interfere in the civil disputes and pass ...= Heard learned counsel for the Petitioners and Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home representing for respondent State. Perused the material on record. Learned Assistant Government Pleader on instructions would submit that there are civil disputes between the Petitioners and respondents 5 to 7. Learned Assistant Government Pleader would submit that in the light of the interim order passed by a Coordinate Bench of this Court on 13.09.2022 in IA No.1 of 2022, Police did not interfere in the civil disputes between the parties. Learned Assistant Government Pleader requested to dispose of the Writ Petition by passing appropriate orders. Learned counsel for the Petitioners would submit that recording the said submission, this Writ Petition may be disposed of. Considering the submissions made, this Writ Petition is disposed of. Interim order passed by a Coordinate Bench of this Court on 13.09.2022 in IA 4 No.1 of 2022 is made absolute. Respondent Police are directed to follow due process of law with regard to the subject matter. No order as to costs. Pending applications, if any, shall stand closed. DR.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Mjl/* 07.01.2026 5 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Writ Petition No. 29296 of 2022 07.01.2026 Mjl /*